Spring cannon question involving conservation of energy.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the necessary compression of a spring in a cannon to hit a target box 2.2m away, given that a 1.1cm compression falls short by 27cm. Participants explore the relationship between elastic potential energy and kinetic energy, noting the need for the spring constant and other variables like mass and height to solve the problem. They suggest using kinematic equations to find initial velocity but encounter difficulties due to insufficient information. A recommendation is made to approach the problem symbolically, combining unknowns into a single constant and assuming a horizontal launch angle. The conversation emphasizes the importance of making reasonable assumptions to simplify the calculations.
MrMagoo22
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two children are playing a game in which they try to hit a small box on the floor with a marble fired from a spring-loaded cannon mounted on a table. The target box is 2.2m horizontally away from the edge of the table. The spring is compressed 1.1cm, but the ball falls short of the box by 27cm. How far does the spring need to be compressed to hit the box directly? It is assumed that friction will not affect this problem.

Homework Equations




Kinetic Energy: Ke = (1/2)mv^2
Elastic Potential Energy: ePe = (1/2)kx^2
Conservation of Mechanical Energy: Pe = -Ke
Kinematic Equations:
X = ViT + (1/2)at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



Started working with elastic potential energy first, realizing that I'd need to know the spring constant to get the potential energy, which would lead to the answer:

ePe = (1/2)k(0.011)
ePe = -Ke = -1/2mv^2
(.0055)k = (-1/2)mv^2

Wasn't working out past that point, too many unknowns, so I tried working with the trajectory of the shot with kinematics to get the initial velocity of the shot and work back:

Vix =
Vx =
Ax = 0
X = 1.92
T =
Viy = 0
Vy =
Ay = -9.81
Y =

None of the kinematics worked off that small amount of information, so I was stuck again. It feels like there isn't enough information available to get an actual answer (no mass for ball, no table height, no spring constant, really any of those would help.) but I may be overlooking something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try putting away your calculator until the very end and work symbolically. You will find that all the unknown values can be lumped together into a single constant, and that you won't even need that if you set up a ratio at the end (a bit like using PV = nRT to find changes in pressure and volume).

You'll have to make certain assumptions about the trajectory (for example, you might assume that the launch angle is horizontal, and that the table height is fixed at some value, say h).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top