Spring equation proof and work question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a particle attached to two identical springs on a frictionless table. For part a, the force exerted by the springs on the particle is derived, with emphasis on understanding the components of the force equation, particularly the significance of the term (1 - L/(sqrt(x^2 + L^2))). In part b, participants discuss the need to integrate the force function to calculate the work done as the particle moves from position A to 0. Clarifications are sought regarding the cancellation of vertical components of the forces and the overall approach to solving the problem. The conversation highlights the complexities of the spring mechanics involved in this scenario.
gaborfk
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
A particle is attached between two identical springs on a horizontal frictionless table. Both springs have spring constant k and are initially unstressed.

|\
| \
| \
-------A---
| /
| /
|/

a) If the particle is pulled a distance x along a direction perpendicular to the initial configuration of the spring, show that the force exerted by the springs on the particle F=-2kx(1-L/(sqrt(x^2+L^2)))i (where L is the vertical distance of each spring at rest)

b) Determine the amount of work done by this force in moving the particle from x=A to x=0


On part a)

I got that the 2 is there since there are two springs. The L/(sqrt(x^2+L^2) is the sin of the angle between the a spring and the vertical. Where does the (1-) comes from? Also how do I tie the equation together, after figuring out all the parts?

On part b)

Do I have to integrate f(x) as x=A goes to x=0?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculate the stretch of one spring from its equilibrium length of L. (This is where you'll see the "1-" term.)
Only the horizontal component of that force survives in the net force.
 
Thank You ! I did not realize that the vertical components cancel out!

Bye
 
Need Explanation

I still don't understand how the problem will work... could you explain with a few steps how to solve both parts? :redface:
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top