Spring Force Gauge: Is It Possible to Use a Spring Not Obeying Hooke's Law?

AI Thread Summary
Using a spring that does not obey Hooke's Law as a force gauge is possible if the relationship between force and displacement is known, as this allows for accurate measurements despite non-linear behavior. For instance, if the force varies with the square of the displacement, the scale will reflect this non-linear relationship. Regarding the inclined plane scenario, once a block begins to move, it will continue moving until an obstacle halts it, assuming the angle remains constant. To measure the kinetic friction coefficient using only the inclined plane, one can analyze the forces acting on the block as it moves down the incline. Understanding these principles is essential for accurate measurements in both scenarios.
Crusher
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to use a spring which does not obey hooke's law as a force gauge? If so, how?

also

If you incline the plane so that the block starts to move do you expect it to slow down and stop? If so why? If not, what do you expect? How can you measure the kintetic friction coefficient using the inclined plane only?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hooke's law is approximation that states that there is linear relationship between force and displacement. In order to measure the force through the displacement, you have to know the law with which force is related to that displacement (the extension of that spring).
For example if the spring has characteristic where the force goes with the square of the displacement then the spaces in your scale won't be equal but will be getting bigger according to the square rule.
So in short yes if you know the law force-displacement.

If the block starts to move by its one, then it will continue to move until some obstacle stops it, assume the angle is not changing, so I won't expect it to stop.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top