Spring/Mass System with Unequal Masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter MichalXC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
MichalXC
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I want to find the equations of motion of two masses m_1 and m_2 attached to each other by a spring on a smooth surface assuming m_2 is given an instantaneous velocity v_0 at time zero. Call the unstretched length of the spring l.

Homework Equations



I want to solve this using purely Newtonian methods.

The Attempt at a Solution



The position of m_1 in the center of mass frame is given by:

r_{1_{CM}} = r_1 - R_{CM} = \frac {m_2 (r_1 - r_2)}{m_1+m_2}

Likewise, the position of m_2 in the CM frame is:

r_{2_{CM}} = r_2 - R_{CM} = \frac {m_1 (r_2 - r_1)}{m_1+m_2}

I can write down Newton's equations for each mass using for Hooke's law r_{2_{CM}} - r_{1_{CM}} - l as the displacement of the length of the spring from its equilibrium position.

At this point, I get two differential equations that I do not know how to solve. (Not SHM.) Can anybody help me?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation become SHM in the COM frame. In your notation, just make the substitution: r_{1CM} = - r_{2CM}
 
Is that substitution justifiable even though the two masses are unequal? Certainly the distance from the center of mass to m_1 need not equal the distance from the center of mass to m_2...
 
What are the differential equations you get?
 
The force on mass one will be:

F_1 = m_1 r''_{1_{CM}} = - k (r_{2_{CM}} - r_{1_{CM}} - l)

And on mass two:

F_2 = m_2 r''_{2_{CM}} = + k (r_{2_{CM}} - r_{1_{CM}} - l)

(Please correct me if this is wrong!)
 
Two possible approaches:

1. You should be able to get an equation of the form
\frac{m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2} \ddot{r} = -krwith an appropriate definition of r.

2. You could write your equations as single matrix equation and then diagonalize the matrix. That'll decouple the equations for you.

I know the first approach is definitely doable because it's a standard result in classical mechanics. The second one might work. I haven't worked it out, so there could be complications I'm not aware of.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top