Springs and Splitting Mass Concept Confusion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a block attached to a spring that splits into two parts during oscillation. At maximum speed, the block's potential energy is zero, and the kinetic energy is at its peak, leading to a change in amplitude and frequency when mass is halved. After the split, the amplitude decreases by a factor of √2, while the frequency increases by the same factor due to the relationship between mass and frequency in simple harmonic motion. When the block splits at the extreme position, the potential energy remains constant, but the amplitude does not change, highlighting the energy conservation principle. The key takeaway is that the point of separation affects the system's energy distribution, influencing amplitude and frequency differently.
snowcrystal42
Am I thinking about this problem correctly?

"A block is attached to a horizontal spring and oscillates back and forth on a frictionless horizontal surface at a frequency of 3 Hz. The amplitude of the motion is 5.08 x 10-2 m. At the point where the block has its maximum speed, it suddenly splits into two parts, only one part remaining attached to the string. (a) What are the amplitude and frequency of the simple harmonic motion that exists after the block splits? (b) What about when the block splits while at one of the extreme ends?"

(a) First of all, the answer key I was given has an equation that looks like it relates to elastic potential energy (it says ½mv2 = ½kA2). Isn't the point where the speed is at its max also where the box is at its equilibrium position (and in this case where the spring is unstretched) so the elastic potential energy is zero? How would elastic potential energy be related to this otherwise? Shouldn't the object/spring only have translational kinetic energy?

Since Vmax = Aω and ω = √(k/m)

A = Vmax√(m/k)

Since the mass is halved, A is divided by √2 so the answer is just the original amplitude divided by √2, right?

Then if Aω = Vmax, A(2πƒ) = Vmax so ƒ = Vmax / (2πA), so if A is divided by √2 then frequency is multiplied by √2, correct?

(b) This is the part that sort of confuses me. At the ends, V = 0 so there is no kinetic energy; all the energy is in the form of potential energy. If PE = ½(kx2), then mass isn't a part of determining the potential energy, so the potential energy stays the same? If the potential energy doesn't change, why does this mean that the amplitude doesn't change?

From a non-mathematical point of view, why does it matter where you break the block in half?

And if the amplitude doesn't change, why does the frequency change? And how do you know by how much? Is it because ω = 2πƒ = √(k/m) so if the mass is halved then the frequency is multiplied by √2 ?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snowcrystal42 said:
(a) First of all, the answer key I was given has an equation that looks like it relates to elastic potential energy (it says ½mv2 = ½kA2). Isn't the point where the speed is at its max also where the box is at its equilibrium position (and in this case where the spring is unstretched) so the elastic potential energy is zero? How would elastic potential energy be related to this otherwise? Shouldn't the object/spring only have translational kinetic energy?
The answer key is probably using conservation of energy and relating the energy at the point of maximum speed to the energy at maximum amplitude.

Since Vmax = Aω and ω = √(k/m)

A = Vmax√(m/k)

Since the mass is halved, A is divided by √2 so the answer is just the original amplitude divided by √2, right?
Yes. The half of the mass that is not attached to the spring has no effect on the motion of the half of the mass that is still attached to the spring.

Then if Aω = Vmax, A(2πƒ) = Vmax so ƒ = Vmax / (2πA), so if A is divided by √2 then frequency is multiplied by √2, correct?
Yes. You could also get this result by using the relation between f and √(k/m) as you note at the end of your post.

(b) This is the part that sort of confuses me. At the ends, V = 0 so there is no kinetic energy; all the energy is in the form of potential energy. If PE = ½(kx2), then mass isn't a part of determining the potential energy, so the potential energy stays the same?
Yes
If the potential energy doesn't change, why does this mean that the amplitude doesn't change?
Think about a mass on a spring and starting the motion by pulling the mass a certain distance D from equilibrium and letting it go from rest. How is the amplitude A related to the distance D? Does your answer depend on the amount of mass that is attached to the spring?

From a non-mathematical point of view, why does it matter where you break the block in half?
When you break the block at the point of maximum speed are you changing the energy of the mass-spring system? When you break the block at the point of maximum ampliltude, are you changing the energy of the mass-spring system?

And if the amplitude doesn't change, why does the frequency change? And how do you know by how much? Is it because ω = 2πƒ = √(k/m) so if the mass is halved then the frequency is multiplied by √2 ?
Yes to your final question.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top