Squaring both sides of equation and inequality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArmanZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
Squaring both sides of an equation, such as A=B, maintains equality, resulting in A^2=B^2. However, squaring both sides of an inequality, like A>B, can lead to incorrect conclusions depending on the signs of A and B. For positive numbers, squaring preserves the inequality, but for negative numbers, it can reverse it. The discussion highlights that without specific bounds on the numbers, general rules for squaring inequalities cannot be established. Ultimately, the nature of inequalities complicates the application of operations like squaring, as demonstrated through various examples.
ArmanZ
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
What is a square of a number? A^2=A*A. If A=B squaring both sides will give A^2=B^2. How I think about squaring is we multiply both sides of A=B by A(we could also do this for B) we get A*A=B*A but A=B so this will result in A*A=B*B.
But if we do this for an inequality, A>B, multiplying both sides by A will yield two scenarios(when A>0 and A<0) A*A>B*A and A*A<B*A in both cases A≠B. So is it possible to square an inequality?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You've almost answered the question yourself - stick some numbers in as an example and you're there:

Here's an inequality: 3 > -4

Square both sides : 9 > 16 (which is incorrect!)

However, if you try the same with two positive numbers then the inequality remains. So you can't define a rule that says you can square an inequality (without potentially changing the nature of the inequality
 
  • Like
Likes ArmanZ
mgkii said:
So you can't define a rule that says you can square an inequality
I think it could be, just for two real numbers ##a,b>0.##
##a>b>0,## then ##a^2>b^2.##
##a<b<0,## then ##a^2>b^2.##
 
  • Like
Likes ArmanZ
I think my question is not clear. For example 2>4(both are positive).If we square both sides we get 4>16, which would be correct if we did did not consider the following fact: 4>16⇔2*2>4*4 but how could we get 2*2>4*4 from 2>4 if we have to multiply both sides by different numbers( 2 and 4, 2≠4) which is incorrect in principle. Or am I wrong? Because in equation a=b multiplying both sides by a will yield a*a=b*a but a=b so a*a=b*b, which is a^2=b^2. But in inequality it seems to be different. Thanks for your replies guys.
 
I'm not totally sure I understand your question so apologies I've advance if this isn't what you asked:

For an equality it doesn't matter what you do to each side (as long as it's the same) as by definition the starting point for that operation is the same. So multiple by 4, square it, add 6 and double it, whatever you do will be the same as the starting point is the same.

For an inequality there's an infinity of ways each side can differ, so unless you put bounds on your function as one of the earlier responders noted, you can't make general observations about the function you apply to each side (square, multiply by 12, etc)
 
  • Like
Likes ArmanZ
ArmanZ said:
I think my question is not clear. For example 2>4(both are positive).If we square both sides we get 4>16, which would be correct if we did did not consider the following fact: 4>16⇔2*2>4*4 but how could we get 2*2>4*4 from 2>4 if we have to multiply both sides by different numbers( 2 and 4, 2≠4) which is incorrect in principle. Or am I wrong? Because in equation a=b multiplying both sides by a will yield a*a=b*a but a=b so a*a=b*b, which is a^2=b^2. But in inequality it seems to be different. Thanks for your replies guys.

Consider two positive numbers ##a## and ##b##. If ##a<b##, then we can multiply both sides with ##a## to get ##a^2 < ab##. We can also multiply both sides with ##b## to get ##ab<b^2##. Putting both together gives ##a^2<ab<b^2##, which gives ##a^2<b^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes ArmanZ
ArmanZ said:
I think my question is not clear. For example 2>4(both are positive).If we square both sides we get 4>16, which would be correct
No.
You're starting from a statement that is not true -- 2 is NOT larger than 4.
ArmanZ said:
if we did did not consider the following fact: 4>16⇔2*2>4*4 but how could we get 2*2>4*4 from 2>4 if we have to multiply both sides by different numbers( 2 and 4, 2≠4) which is incorrect in principle. Or am I wrong? Because in equation a=b multiplying both sides by a will yield a*a=b*a but a=b so a*a=b*b, which is a^2=b^2. But in inequality it seems to be different. Thanks for your replies guys.
 
Mark44 said:
No.
You're starting from a statement that is not true -- 2 is NOT larger than 4.
Sorry, I made a careless mistake once again
 
ArmanZ said:
I think my question is not clear. For example 2>4(both are positive).If we square both sides we get 4>16, which would be correct if we did did not consider the following fact: 4>16⇔2*2>4*4 but how could we get 2*2>4*4 from 2>4 if we have to multiply both sides by different numbers( 2 and 4, 2≠4) which is incorrect in principle. Or am I wrong? Because in equation a=b multiplying both sides by a will yield a*a=b*a but a=b so a*a=b*b, which is a^2=b^2. But in inequality it seems to be different. Thanks for your replies guys.
For everyone who found this discussion, in this comment I was implying 2<4, 4<16⇔2*2<4*4, 2*2<4*4. But anyway, I hope the general idea of this discussion is understood correctly by everyone.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top