Stability of Carbocation: The Impact of +I Effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter nishanth R
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stability
AI Thread Summary
The +I effect can stabilize a carbocation by increasing electron density, which helps neutralize the positive charge. However, this stabilization may come at the cost of altering the carbocation's nature, potentially leading to instability. Inductive and mesomeric effects, such as +I and +M, further contribute to the stabilization of carbocations by reducing their electron deficiency. The balance between stabilization and the preservation of the carbocation's characteristics is crucial in understanding its overall stability. Ultimately, the +I effect plays a complex role in carbocation stability.
nishanth R
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Does +I effect stabilize or destabilize a carbocation

Homework Equations



NA

The Attempt at a Solution


In one way, +I effect tends to increase electron density on the carbocation and hence neutralize the charge and hence would stabilize it. On the other hand, the nature of carbocation would be lost( I don't know whether that is related to unstability)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
inductive and mesomer effects(+I , +M) stabilize carbocation because they decrease carbocation's electron deficiency
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Why is phenyl carbocation unstable?
Replies
2
Views
3K
Stability of tropylium cation vs triphenyl methyl cation
Replies
1
Views
5K
Do alkenes only form carbocations while carbonyl groups only form carbanions?
Replies
1
Views
1K
Order of bond energy in furan, pyrolle and thiophene
Replies
1
Views
2K
Stability of carbocations and inductive effect
Replies
1
Views
2K
What Are the Products of Benzonitrile with CH3CH2CH2Cl and CH3COCl Using AlCl3?
Replies
1
Views
3K
Electropositivity - 2nd opinion needed
Replies
1
Views
2K
Chemistry Correct order of bond length in two organic molecules
Replies
6
Views
2K
Why Tetrahydrothiophene is Stronger Acid than Tetrahydrofuran
Replies
8
Views
2K
What can I add to a Taekwondo body protector scoring systeme to be more stable?
Replies
1
Views
798

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top