Standards for qualifying mechanical equipment in NPPs

AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights the lack of comprehensive resources on the qualification of mechanical equipment in nuclear power plants, contrasting it with the well-established standards for electrical equipment like IEEE 323 and IEEE 344. While ASME NQA-1 addresses general quality requirements for manufacturers, participants seek an equivalent standard for mechanical equipment. Key references include the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, and relevant parts of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, particularly 10 CFR Part 50. Additionally, NUREGs and Regulatory Guides, especially NUREG-0800, provide further insights and references. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for clearer guidelines on mechanical equipment qualification in the nuclear sector.
ccll1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am rather familiar with qualification of electrical equipment in nuclear power plants (such as IEEE 323, IEEE 344 etc.).

However, a extensive web inquiry about qualification of mechanical equipment did not yield any results (beside ASME NQA-1, which seems to discuss general quality requirements for manufacturers of mechanical equipment).

So what's the equivalent of IEEE 323 for mechanical equipment in NPPs?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top