Standing Waves help 30 mins left.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding standing waves, specifically in the context of two strings oscillating at different harmonics. The first string vibrates in the fundamental mode while the second string vibrates in the third harmonic, with a specified length ratio. Participants seek clarification on calculating the tension ratio and frequency for the second string. Key formulas mentioned include the relationship between string length, wavelength, frequency, and tension. The final answers provided are a tension ratio of 1.70 and a frequency of 0.667 Hz for the second string in the fundamental mode.
evgeniy
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Standing Waves help! 30 mins left.

Hello everyone who's here, so far I've been doing great on waves, but what the heck is standing eave?

Here is a problem that I kinda get, but not completely:

Two strings, with the same mass/length m oscillate with the same frequency f=2.00 Hz. The first string has length L1, tension T1 and vibrates in the fundamental mode (n=1). The second string has length L2, tension T2 and vibrates in the third harmonic (n=3). Assuming L2=2.30 L1:

a) What is the ratio T1/T2?

b) What would be the frequency of the second string if it oscillates in the mode n=1?

what the hell is fundamental mode?
please help, or at least give hints,
thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well it's kinda late now, and i got the answers here:

1) 1.70
2) 0.667 Hz

Can anyone tell me how to get them at least so i know how to do them on the test?? (formulas may be)?
 
Main fomulae:

L= (2n-1)(wavelength)/4

and velocity=(frequency)(wavelength)

where L=length of string
 
are u saying to find wavelength first?
what about the tension?
 
evgeniy said:
are u saying to find wavelength first?
what about the tension?

The speeds of the waves are equal to sqrt(tension/mass per unit length). Since the masses are the same, ratio of speeds will be the square root of the ratio of tensions.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top