Standing waves on a transmission line and time

AI Thread Summary
Standing waves on a transmission line result from the superposition of incident and reflected voltage waves, creating fixed voltage minima and maxima at intervals of λ/2. While standing waves are not traveling waves by definition, the voltage at any point on the line does vary with time and frequency, as indicated by the phasor representation. The standing wave pattern emerges when the source and termination are mismatched, leading to reflections that create the standing wave effect. The standing wave ratio (SWR) provides a measure of voltage maximum to minimum but does not depict the standing wave pattern itself. Understanding the relationship between time, frequency, and standing waves clarifies how these concepts interact in transmission line theory.
FrankJ777
Messages
140
Reaction score
6
Hi, I'm hoping somebody can help me understand something. I'm studying transmission lines and I'm confused about SWR and standing waves on a transmission line. According to my book the voltage on the transmision line is the super position of an incident and reflected voltage wave given by:
V_{(z)} = V^{+}_{0} ( e^{-jBz} + \Gamma e^{jBz})

I can see how this produces a standing wave with voltage minimums and maximums at fixed points every λ/2. What I'm confused about is why the voltage is not represented as a function of time. From what I thought I understood about the phasor representation of the voltage we dropped the factor e^{jωt} in our notation, but that it's understood that it's still there and the wave is still a funtion of time and frequency (jωt). So my questions are these. Are standing waves also a function of time and frequency, and if so would they be traveling waves? It seems that according to my text the min and max points are at fixed distances, so it seems that the voltage wave doesn't travel. So what happened to time and frequency?

Thanks to anyone who can set me straight.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Standing wave is not time dependent, like a guitar string that the fundamental has the peak in the middle. If you go through the the wave traveling on the a transmission from the source at one end and termination on the other end. If the source and termination is not match, you will develop a standing wave pattern. It is the voltage traveling forward and reflect back that cause the standing wave pattern. If you solve the equation you posted with z, you'll see the standing wave pattern.

SWR only tells you the Vmax/Vmin or something like that, it does not tell you what standing wave pattern looks like, but from a standing wave pattern, you can find the SWR by just measuring it.

For a cosine wave,

\cos (\omega t-\beta z) = Re[e^{j(\omega t-\beta z)}]\;=\; Re[e^{j\omega t}e^{-\beta z}]\;=\;Re [ e^{\omega t}\tilde A ]

Phazor is defined as \tilde A = e^{-\beta z}

Phasor do not have time information, but it is understood that phasor is ONLY part of the function with time function ignored for simplification.
 
Thanks guys.
I found this video and it seems to to describe it pretty well visually.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=s5MBno0PZjE

I think what confused me is that it in my textbook (Pozar), it shows that the standing wave is the supper position of the incident and reflected wave,and it describes the reflected waves as phasors with a dependence on z only. I didn't see how in the time domain the incident and reflected wave would make standing wave, but in the video it shows exactly that.
 
The standing wave pattern just shows the maxima. The levels between these +and- maxima are time dependent.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top