Star Collapse: Why Not in Early Stages?

AI Thread Summary
A star does not collapse in its early stages due to the strong radiation pressure generated by fusion reactions in its core, primarily fueled by hydrogen. As a star ages, it exhausts its hydrogen supply and begins fusing heavier elements like helium and carbon, leading to a decrease in energy output. Eventually, when a star can no longer sustain fusion reactions, it loses the energy needed to counteract gravitational forces, resulting in collapse. Throughout most of its life, a star loses minimal mass, primarily through solar wind, while the fuel converts to helium, remaining within the star. Cepheid variables illustrate this process, as they undergo cyclical collapse and expansion over billions of years.
bassplayer142
Messages
431
Reaction score
0
Why doesn't a star collapse in the early stages of its life instead of the later. You would think that with less gas at the end stages gravity would weaken and not allow a black hole.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
A star is held up by the energy (actaully radiation pressure) given off by the fusion reaction in the centre. A young star is mostly hydrogen which reacts rather well, as a star ages it uses up hydrogen in the core, then Helium, Carbon etc until it gets to a material that won't easily react. As there is no more energy it then collapses.
A star loses a negligible amount of it's mass through most of it's life - mostly charged particles in the solar wind. Remember the fuel that is used in the reaction doesn't get used up, it just converts to helium which stays in the star.
 
Cepheid variables are a good example. They are relatively massive stars that cyclically collapse and expand. During the collapse phase, they reheat, and the reheating causes them to expand once again. This cycle can continue for billions of years.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top