Star formation and distribution in spiral galaxies

AI Thread Summary
In spiral galaxies, the nucleus primarily contains old population II stars, with active star formation occurring in the spiral arms instead. This lack of star formation in the nucleus is attributed to strong tidal forces from the supermassive black hole, which require higher material density for gravitational collapse. Additionally, larger magnetic fields at the galactic center restrict cloud collapse, while increased metallicity raises opacity, hindering energy escape from collapsing clouds. The nucleus, often referred to as the bulge, varies in size and composition across different spiral galaxies. Despite the focus on the nucleus, significant star formation is still observed in the central regions of some spiral galaxies, indicating that gas is present for new star creation.
hellfire
Science Advisor
Messages
1,048
Reaction score
1
In the nucleus of a spiral galaxy the most stars are old population II stars, and there is no star formation (which occurs in the spiral arms). Why?

Thanks.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
With respect to the no star formation, I've found this explanation

"The strong tidal forces created by the supermassive black hole require material to have a larger than normal density in order for it to collapse from its own gravity. The rate of the cloud collapse is further restricted by the larger than normal magnetic fields which permeate throughout the galactic center. Finally, the material at the galactic center contains a larger amount of metals (all atoms besides hydrogen or helium) than the rest of the galactic disk. This increase in metallicity impedes the collapse of the star since the material has an large opacity which prevents energy from escaping the collapsing cloud."
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~tanner/gcsf.html#SF
Hope it helps
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vey interesting http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~tanner/pictures/gc_1meter_big.gif Meteor
 
Last edited by a moderator:
hellfire said:
In the nucleus of a spiral galaxy the most stars are old population II stars, and there is no star formation (which occurs in the spiral arms). Why?

Thanks.
Some clarifications ... the 'nucleus' of a galaxy - spiral or otherwise - isn't a particularly well defined region. Historically, it meant something like 'the bright point we see on images, at the apparent centre of the galaxy; it's too small to resolve, so we don't know what's really there' Some astronomers made (then) very tricky observations of the radial brightness and colour profiles of the central few arcsec of nearby galaxies; these days the VLT, Hubble, etc make nice images of what older astronomers could 'see' only as a fuzzball. The central part of a spiral is the 'bulge', which varies in size from tiny (in Sc spirals) to huge (in Sa and lenticulars); it is the bulge which is comprised of Population II stars.

As the link which meteor provided makes very clear, lots of star formation is occurring in the central few hundred pc of the Milky Way; an interesting finding is that new clusters (Arches, Quintuplet) seem to contain large numbers of quite massive stars (e.g. the Pistol Star). Indeed, the central parts of many spirals clearly contain lots of gas, from which new stars may form!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
26
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top