Calculating Energy of Separating Stars: Potential vs Kinetic Energy

  • Thread starter Thread starter zezima1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star System
AI Thread Summary
The exercise involved calculating the total energy required to separate stars to an infinite distance, focusing on both potential and kinetic energy. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the necessity of including kinetic energy in these calculations. It is clarified that the work needed to separate the stars is based on the potential energy of the system in its initial state. The assignment specifically requests the energy needed for separation, which supports the inclusion of both energy types. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of the assignment's wording and its implications for the calculations.
zezima1
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
I recently did an exercise where I had to calculate the total energy needed to separate the stars completely from each other - i.e. make the distance between them infinity.
One then had to calculate the potential energy between them as well as their kinetic energies. But there's something I don't get here - why do you have to use the kinetic energy in the calculations too. Couldnt you imagine a situation where the kinetic energy was the same after they had been separated by a distance of infinity.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work needed to separate the stars to infinity is the potential energy of the system in it's initial state. The total energy of the system is the potential energy and the kinetic energy.

Check the wording of the problem.
 
Well the assignment explicitly asks: What amount of energy is needed to separate the stars to a distance infinitely far from each other.
 
Well then, I'd say you have a point :)
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top