Star Threatens Earth: Is it Real?

  • Thread starter Thread starter engineroom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Star
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on skepticism regarding the claims of a star threatening Earth, highlighting that the potential danger is largely speculative. Participants express concern over the alarmist tone of media reports, questioning their reliability in scientific matters. While some acknowledge that gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) could pose a risk, they emphasize that no GRBs have been observed in nearby galaxies, making the threat seem remote. There is a consensus that humanity has ample time, estimated at 500 million years, to develop strategies to mitigate such risks. Overall, the conversation underscores a cautious approach to sensationalized scientific claims.
engineroom
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
http://www.stuff.co.nz/4426392a10.html

Is this for real? I am somewhat sceptical of anything of a technical or scietific field that I read in the mass media.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Reading it through, it seems that the possibility of a real danger is highly speculative.
 
mathman said:
Reading it through, it seems that the possibility of a real danger is highly speculative.


Highly speculative yes but don't you love how alarmist the tone & headline are.
 
engineroom said:
...I am somewhat sceptical of anything of a technical or scientific field that I read in the mass media...
Agreed. I used my good friend Google and found http://www.usyd.edu.au/news/84.html?newsstoryid=2181".As for the actual article itself, it's definitely possible, http://www.nasa.gov/vision/universe/starsgalaxies/gammaray_extinction.html" seem to think so.. but I think we have 500 million years or so to plan for it..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No GRB has been observed in any nearby galaxy, much less our own. I deem the probability very remote. If humanity persists for another 500 million years, I anticipate we will have long since acquired the ability to dodge such a bullet.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top