Stars eventually die because they use up their fuel right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boogeyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fuel Stars
AI Thread Summary
Stars eventually die as they exhaust their nuclear fuel, leading to a future where no new stars can form once all elements are burned down to iron and heavier elements. This process will result in a cold universe, often referred to as the "heat death," where life as we know it would cease to exist. However, even in this scenario, there will still be occasional star formation from collisions between brown dwarfs and white dwarfs, producing new stars that can last trillions of years. The universe's fate remains uncertain, as it could potentially recollapse due to unforeseen cosmic changes. Ultimately, the long-term future of stars and the universe suggests a gradual decline into coldness and darkness.
Boogeyman
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
Stars eventually die because they use up their fuel right? If all of this fuel was to be used up, would there be no suns?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


Boogeyman said:
Stars eventually die because they use up their fuel right?
They convert elements into other elements extracting some energy.
Different size suns (and the same sun at different times during it's life) use different elements, so larger red suns can burn the 'waste' of smaller hotter suns.

If all of this fuel was to be used up, would there be no suns?
Ultimately all the elements could be burned to the point where there is no more energy to be extracted by burning them further - there would only be iron and heavier elements left.

- that's going to take a while though :-)
 


Yeah I know but if it happens that would mean death of life, and a cold universe?
 


Boogeyman said:
Yeah I know but if it happens that would mean death of life, and a cold universe?

Yes it does, as the Universe keeps expanding it cools, thus when the stars finally go out it will be very cold... but not everywhere. Every hundred billion years or so brown dwarfs will collide with each other or with a white dwarf and produce a new star that will last ~0.1-10 trillion years. Roughly a hundred such dim stars will burn in our Galaxy at a time, for about 10,000 quadrillion years until the Galaxy falls apart. After that happens the hottest things will be neutron stars "glowing" at 3 K from proton-decay... very, very cold.

But we don't yet know if the Universe will last that long - it might recollapse due to some cosmic change.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top