Starting Limits HW Supposedly Easy

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phyzwizz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Phyzwizz
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Just started learning limits today but I got stuck on this last problem...

Let f be the function given by f(x)=lnx/x for all x>0

Find lim f(x) as x-->0+

So I graphed the equation and plugged in points approaching zero on the right side but it seems to go on for infinity. Is the limit infinity? is that possible?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. In fact it goes to -∞.
 
Uh, no, the limit is neither \infty nor -\infty. The limit, as x goes to 0, of ln(x) is -\infty (which may be what LCKurtz meant) but that x in the denominator makes the limit 0. x goes to \infty "faster" than ln(x) goes to -\infty.
 
Awesome, thanks for the help guys. That clears things up. Oh and this doesn't have anything to do with limits, but how do you do the custom equations thing that makes the math equations on this site look so clean and wonderful.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Uh, no, the limit is neither \infty nor -\infty. The limit, as x goes to 0, of ln(x) is -\infty (which may be what LCKurtz meant) but that x in the denominator makes the limit 0. x goes to \infty "faster" than ln(x) goes to -\infty.

I don't follow this. If we're talking about:

\frac{ln(x)}{x}

As x -> 0+, the numerator approaches -inf and the denominator approaches +0, so you should obtain -inf?
 
Last edited:
HallsofIvy said:
Uh, no, the limit is neither \infty nor -\infty. The limit, as x goes to 0, of ln(x) is -\infty (which may be what LCKurtz meant) but that x in the denominator makes the limit 0. x goes to \infty "faster" than ln(x) goes to -\infty.

The limit is -∞. x → 0 in the denominator giving a -∞/0+ form.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top