Startup Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos (IGC) at Penn State

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
Announcement of the inaugeral conference of the IGC in August.
http://www.gravity.psu.edu/igc/

description of what the new institute is to be like and what the purpose is
http://www.gravity.psu.edu/igc/igc-web.pdf

==quote==
Abhay Ashtekar, holder of the Eberly Chair in Physics and the
Director of the current Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry, will
serve as the Director of the new Institute and Paul Sommers, Professor of
Physics, will serve as the Associate Director. The Institute will integrate the
theoretical and observational research carried out in its three centers: the
Center for Fundamental Theory, headed by Murat Gunaydin, Professor of
Physics; the Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, by Sam Finn, Professor
of Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics; and the Center for Particle
Astrophysics by Peter Mészáros, the Eberly Professor of Astronomy and
Astrophysics and the Chief Theorist for the Swift GRBE mission.

For over a decade, the Institute for Gravitational Physics and Geometry has played a leading role at the interface of physics, mathematics and astronomy. The Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos builds on these strong foundations by making use of the unique strengths in particle astrophysics that Penn State now enjoys. From quantum cosmology to new observational windows, the new Institute will seek greater understanding of the physical universe and its extreme events.

Vision

The Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos will be dedicated to fostering the highest quality education and research in cosmology, general relativity, gravitational wave astronomy, particle astrophysics, quantum gravity and string theory, [/color] focusing on high energy phenomena and fundamental issues in the Science of the Cosmos...[/size]

==endquote==
notice that Ashtekar's institute IGPG (home base for a lot of the LQG community) has been going over a decade and has been highly successful. A lot of the best LQG people got their PhD here or did postdoc here. Lee Smolin was junior faculty here until he went to Perimeter. The new institute IGC could be seen as an extension of Ashtekar's IGPG to include other stuff: string and foundations studies on the theoretical side and also a lot more on the OBSERVATIONAL side (high energy observational astronomy, gravity wave astronomy etc.)

notice that Perimeter Institute which has proven to be very dynamic---prolific and creative research output---has a fair number of string-thinkers as well as a large piece of the LQG and spinfoam action.

this may prove to be a pattern for the future. that is: the institutes where there are fresh ideas and noteworthy new work will be HYBRID. Top departments will not be string-only, but will have to be strong in Loop/spinfoam as well. If Harvard theory group and Princeton IAS theory group remain string-only monoculture they will find themselves passed up by Penn State.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It will be interesting to see how the new Institute develops and if it is able to attract top talent in the years to come. It looks like an exciting opportunity and I'm looking forward to the inaugural conference in August!
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top