Stat mech and binomial distribution

erogard
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose that particles of two different species, A and B, can be chosen with
probability p_A and p_B, respectively.

What would be the probability p(N_A;N) that N_A out of N particles are of type A?

The Attempt at a Solution



I figured this would correspond to a binomial distrib:

p_N(N_A) = \frac{N!}{N_A ! (N-N_A)!} p_A^{N_A} p_B^{N-N_A}

Now I'm asked to consider the case where N gets large. Then I need to find p(N_A;N) using 1) Stirling appox. and 2) the central limit theorem.

Not sure how to approach 1) since there are no log in my expression. Actually I don't quite get how to do 2) either. Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) You can introduce the logs! And then remove the logs by exponentiation after you've made the approximation.

2) You should just apply the central limit theorem directly. Do you recall what the CLT says exactly?
 
Matterwave said:
1) You can introduce the logs! And then remove the logs by exponentiation after you've made the approximation.

2) You should just apply the central limit theorem directly. Do you recall what the CLT says exactly?

So I did 1) by taking the log and exponentiating to simplify.

Regarding 2), I'm looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_limit_theorem and I'm assuming the Linderberg version is the relevant one here. Not too sure how to apply it, however. Do you know of any simpler formulation of the theorem that would apply to my case? My book does not state it formally. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top