Choosing Mealy vs Moore State Machines: Factors & Insights

AI Thread Summary
When choosing between Mealy and Moore state machines, the primary distinction lies in their output dependency; Mealy machines derive output from both current state and input, while Moore machines rely solely on the current state. Design specifications significantly influence this choice, as Moore machines are often seen as more stable due to their synchronous nature. Additionally, Moore machines typically utilize sequential logic for output buffering, whereas Mealy machines incorporate combinational logic, allowing for potentially faster response times. Understanding these differences is crucial for effective machine design and functionality. Ultimately, the decision should align with the specific requirements of the project.
EvLer
Messages
454
Reaction score
0
What are some possible criteria when to choose Mealy or Moore state machine?
I know that for Mealy, output is a function of present state and input and in Moore it's just present state. I know it also probably depends on the design specifications, but ... just wondering.

Any insights are very much appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's difficult to say in general other than that given definition. It's important to be able to identify how a machine works and knowing whether it is Mealy verus Moore is part of it. For design purposes, you can see that a machine that has output as a function of state only is somewhat 'better' due to its synchronous nature. Moore machines usually have the output and input buffered by some kind of sequential logic (flip-flops and latches), while Mealy machines usually have part of the output directly coming from the input through some combinational logic.
 
Back
Top