Static friction between a cylinder and a wall

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a cylinder resting against a wall, with a rope at the top preventing it from rolling. The weight of the cylinder is given, and the task is to determine the coefficient of friction when the cylinder is on the verge of movement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of free body diagrams and the balance of forces and moments. There are attempts to calculate the normal and tangential forces, with varying results for the coefficient of friction. Questions arise regarding the influence of the rope tension on the forces involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing different methods for calculating forces and coefficients. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of free body diagrams and the role of rope tension, but no consensus has been reached on the correct approach or values.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the contributions of the rope tension to the normal and tangential forces, and the necessity of drawing a free body diagram has been emphasized. Participants are working within the constraints of the problem as presented, with references to textbook results.

Karol
Messages
1,380
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


The cylinder in the drawing weighs 100[N]. there is a horizontal rope at the top that prevents it from rolling. what is the coefficient of friction if it's on the verge of movement

Homework Equations


Friction force: f=μN

The Attempt at a Solution


The whole weight of the cylinder lies on the contact point. the coefficient of friction is the tangent of the slope, which is here 250, thus μ=tan 250=0.422
It should be 0.22
 

Attachments

  • 43.jpg
    43.jpg
    7.8 KB · Views: 504
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you drawn a free body diagram? The normal component of the contact force is not pointing in the vertical direction. So the normal force is not equal to mg. You need to write down the force balance equations for equilibrium, and you probably also need to write down a moment balance equation. Call N the normal contact force, and call F the tangential contact force.

Chet
 
yes i did that but was is a hurry so i used the other method of the tangent which gave the same result.
$$N=100\cdot \sin 65^0,\ F=100\cdot \cos 65^0$$
$$F=\mu N\rightarrow \mu=\frac{100\cdot \cos 65^0}{100\cdot \sin 65^0}=0.466$$
 
Karol said:
yes i did that but was is a hurry so i used the other method of the tangent which gave the same result.
$$N=100\cdot \sin 65^0,\ F=100\cdot \cos 65^0$$

Shouldn't the tension in the rope contribute to these two equations?
 
You left out the effect of the rope tension T. That has a component in the normal direction and a component in the tangential direction. The reason that this happened is that you did not draw a free body diagram.

Chet
 
I thought about it but decided that the rope doesn't influence. the rope only balances the moment (torque) and it comes out right according to the book:
$$100\cdot R\cdot\sin 25^0=T\cdot R(1+\cos 25^0)\rightarrow T=22.17$$
I will draw a free body diagram soon
 
Karol said:
I thought about it but decided that the rope doesn't influence. the rope only balances the moment (torque) and it comes out right according to the book:
$$100\cdot R\cdot\sin 25^0=T\cdot R(1+\cos 25^0)\rightarrow T=22.17$$
I will draw a free body diagram soon
T influences the values of both F and N. Did you really feel that you had advanced beyond the point where you need to draw free body diagrams?

Chet
 
You are right, it comes out good
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K