Static friction question with no mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around estimating static friction for a drag racer covering a quarter mile in 6 seconds on asphalt. Participants highlight the importance of having mass and power information to accurately calculate static friction. One user attempts to calculate acceleration but realizes the lack of necessary data, specifically mass. Another contributor emphasizes that while the friction force cannot be determined without more information, the coefficient of static friction can be estimated. Overall, the conversation underscores the need for additional parameters to solve the problem effectively.
kirstynl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. if a car is speeding off on a surface of asphault, no slipping tires, estimate static friction for a drag racer that covers the quarter mile in 6 seconds



My attempt:

I made a Free Body Diagram: Weight (W) down wards, Normal force (fn) upwards, and friction static friction to the right (Ffs). ou rteacher set that up for us.
I then tried calculating acceleration.

1320=1/2a6^2
a=18.33 m/s/s i think that answer is completely wrong and then i tried figguring out fn

Fn-W= ma
Fn-mg=18.33m
fn-9.8=18.3
Fn=28.1

But i think you have to divide the Fn by the mass times gravity

but i don't have the mass... so i don'/t know phelp pleasee
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't have enough information in the question
I could have a tractor pulling a sledge do 1/4mi in 6 seconds (with a big enough engine) or a I could have an air hockey puck do the same.

You need at least the mass and power.
 
coefficient of static friction

kirstynl said:
1. if a car is speeding off on a surface of asphault, no slipping tires, estimate static friction for a drag racer that covers the quarter mile in 6 seconds
As mgb_phys points out, you don't have enough information to find the friction force. But you can estimate the coefficient of static friction, which might be what your teacher meant.

Hints: When finding the acceleration, convert .25 miles to meters, not feet. How does the friction force relate to the normal force?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top