Medical Static magnetic field and scalp

AI Thread Summary
Static magnetic fields can effectively penetrate human tissue, including the scalp, with no significant barriers posed by biological factors such as blood flow or ion gradients. This property is utilized in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), where high magnetic fields, up to 3T, are employed without direct adverse effects on the body. The primary concern regarding static magnetic fields relates to their indirect effects on medical implants, like pacemakers. Research indicates that there may be minimal, reversible effects on electrocardiogram data due to the interaction between the magnetic field and moving blood, but these effects are negligible below 2T and have been observed even at 0.1T. Overall, static magnetic fields are considered safe for human tissue.
okiedokie
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I was just wondering, do static magnetic fields penetrate effectively into human tissue such as the scalp? What factors would affect the field? Blood flow? Ion gradients?

Thanks!
 
Biology news on Phys.org
okiedokie said:
Hello!

I was just wondering, do static magnetic fields penetrate effectively into human tissue such as the scalp? What factors would affect the field? Blood flow? Ion gradients?

Thanks!
I have some strong neodymium magnets. If I hold them in my palm (palm facing up) I can get a screw or nail to hang from the back of my hand.
 
okiedokie said:
Hello!

I was just wondering, do static magnetic fields penetrate effectively into human tissue such as the scalp? What factors would affect the field? Blood flow? Ion gradients?

Thanks!

Yes they do, and I don't believe anything in the human body can significantly affect this.
 
Static magnetic fields completely penetrate organic tissue.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) uses this fact. When you are in an MRI machine your head, knee, or whatever body part is imaged may be in fields as high as 3T.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_resonance_imaging

At the bottom of the Wiki entry, there is a safety section. It mentions no direct effects of static fields on the human body - only indirect ones, e.g. on implants such as pacemakers.

It is more difficult to find information on the direct effect of static fields on the human body. There appears to be "a small, reversible effect on electrocardiogam data. The cause is the interaction of moving blood (a conductive medium) and the field in the heart. The effect was minimal below about 2 T (but was seen as low as 0.1 T) and is not considered a concern."

http://www.ehs.cornell.edu/File/Magnetic_Field_Safety_Cryo_Guide_v3.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top