Statics Equilibrium Problem - 3 Force body in equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a statics equilibrium problem involving a T-shaped bracket supporting a 150-N load. The reactions at points A and C are calculated for two angles, yielding specific values for each scenario. The user struggles with their calculations, consistently arriving at values that are double the textbook answers. Despite their efforts to verify the results through force triangles and moments, they suspect the textbook may be incorrect. The conversation highlights the importance of checking solutions and the common experience of students questioning textbook accuracy.
yoohoo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Statics Equilibrium Problem -- 3 Force body in equilibrium

Homework Statement



Q: A T-shaped bracket supports a 150-N load as shown. Determine the reactions at A and C when (a) alpha=90o, (b) alpha =45o

A: (a)A=150N going down, C=167.7N,63.4degrees (b)A= 194.5N going down; C=253N, 77.9 degrees

Here's the diagram from the book:

http://www.glowfoto.com/viewimage.php?img=23-165339L&rand=2124&t=jpg&m=07&y=2010&srv=img6

Homework Equations



sum of forces (it is in equilibrium) and force triangle

The Attempt at a Solution



I made a force triangle where I found the angle 23.565 degrees (which makes sense since they give 63.4 degrees in the textbook). However, using the sine law I expected to come out with the right answer using:


150N/sin(23.565) = A/sin(63.4)

and

150N/sin(23.565) = C/sin(90)​

... instead I keep coming out with A and C values that are double what they should be. Ie. A = 300 N and C = 335.4 N

What am I doing wrong? Am I approaching it the wrong way?

Thanks in advance! :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Taking moments about C, it is clear that A = 300 and C=sqr(300^2+150^2)
 


Hmmm... that's what I got... however, the answer in the textbook and according to other sources is 150 N [down] for A and 167.7 N [W 63.4 N] for C.
 


Engineers in practice don't have 'answers in the back' for their real problems, and have to find other ways of checking their solutions. That's what you have to do here. I looked at it algebraically and graphically as a check. It wouldn't be the first time that a book was wrong, although I do accept one should have regard to the answer given with a view to discovering whether you have made an awful error. But in this case, I think you are right. Maybe someone else could confirm.
 


I get the same answers you two do. I think the book is probably wrong, based on the problem statement given here.
 


Thanks both of you for your help... I guess I should have more faith!

Whenever I think a textbooks wrong, I think back to one of my first year profs telling the class that usually when a student gets a different answer than the textbook, it's the student who's wrong --not the textbook haha.
 
Back
Top