Statics Mechanics: Looking for the flaw in my logic

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a statics problem involving a pulley system with a 50kg weight. Initially, the solver struggled with the logic, mistakenly assuming uniform tension across all cables. Upon realizing that the cables exert different tensions, clarity emerged, leading to successful solutions of similar problems. A hypothetical scenario was posed regarding the implications of a single cable running through the pulleys, which prompted a discussion about the resultant forces and the potential collapse of the system. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the mechanics of multiple cables in pulley systems.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Yep...back to old statics. Not because I have a test (already passed it in flying colours) just for fun seeing what I can solve and can't...now I ran into this:

Homework Statement


http://img705.imageshack.us/img705/1533/pulleyf.jpg

Statics:

The weight is 50kg. Find force P to hold it in equilibrium.

The Attempt at a Solution


http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/5787/pulleya.jpg Somehow I got the result in minus, trying to find where is the logic in this. Or, otherwise, where is the flaw in my logic.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Fp! :smile:

Only saw this thread just now.

Weren't you giving lessons in mechanics nowadays?

Anyway, you are assuming that all cables give the same tensional force.
They don't.
It's not all the same cable.
There are 3 cables, each with its own tensional force.
 
I am giving lessons in mechanics, but with a very focused set of materials that I'm well-practiced with. In our course we never gone through several cables connected to system of pulleys. In fact, we hardly gave pulleys much time. At most we had one cable if I recall correctly.

Where do you see 3 cables?
 
And I just solved 2 more such exercises correctly. Don't make me prove myself :) Just needed to understand one "Graphical" principle!
 
Very good! You are :cool:

ehild
 
Good!

If you feel up to the challenge... what would happen if there was indeed 1 cable and holes in the pulleys?
 
Well then P would equal 1/6 of the weight. :)
 
Femme_physics said:
Well then P would equal 1/6 of the weight. :)

Suppose P would equal 1/6 of the weight, what would be the resultant force on the leftmost pulley?
 
  • #10
I like Serena said:
Suppose P would equal 1/6 of the weight, what would be the resultant force on the leftmost pulley?

2/6 of the weight
 
  • #11
Femme_physics said:
2/6 of the weight

That would mean that ƩFy is not zero... what would that mean?
 
  • #12
I like Serena said:
That would mean that ƩFy is not zero... what would that mean?

Of course ƩFy is zero. The resultant force at Y of the rightest pulley is 2/6... Of the middle pulley is also 2/6...and the right 2/6... these are the up vectors in the Y direction...the down vector is just the weight...so of course it ends up being ƩFy=0
 
  • #13
Femme_physics said:
Of course ƩFy is zero. The resultant force at Y of the rightest pulley is 2/6... Of the middle pulley is also 2/6...and the right 2/6... these are the up vectors in the Y direction...the down vector is just the weight...so of course it ends up being ƩFy=0

Which up vectors do you mean?

I see only 2 downward tensional forces on each pulley and the pulleys are not attached to anything else (since we assumed that the cables were not attached to the pulleys).
 
  • #15
Femme_physics said:
Each pulley has two!

Ah, I meant that I didn't see any up vectors on for instance pulley A.
 
  • #16
Wait a second...That was a trick question! If there are no pins attaching the pulleys to the rope they're going to slide down!
 
  • #17
Femme_physics said:
Wait a second...That was a trick question! If there are no pins attaching the pulleys to the rope they're going to slide down!

Yep. The whole thing would collapse! :eek:
 
  • #18
:) Thanks for the stimulation!
 
  • #19
Femme_physics said:
:) Thanks for the stimulation!

I'm just thinking of those poor cardboard men that were standing below that weight! :bugeye: :wink:
 
  • #20
LOL! Remeber them eh? :)
 
Back
Top