Statics Problem istributed Loads

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chandasouk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around ranking the locations of resultant forces applied to a beam under distributed loads. The user initially assumed a beam length of 1 for calculations and identified the centroids of various shapes, concluding that Xc is at 1/3L, Xd at 2/3L, and that Xe and Xf are between L/3 and L/2. The user struggled with determining the centroid of trapezoids and initially provided an incorrect ranking. Ultimately, the correct ranking from smallest to largest is Xc, Xe, Xa, Xb (equal), Xf, and Xd.
Chandasouk
Messages
163
Reaction score
0
Statics Problem:Distributed Loads

http://imageshack.us/a/img845/5825/112639502.jpg

When measuring from the left side of the beam Xa,Xb ,Xc ,Xd ,Xe ,and Xf are the locations where the resultant force is applied in each of the six cases. Rank these six locations.

Rank the items from smallest to largest. To rank items as equivalent, overlap them.

For this problem, I just made the assumption the L was equal to 1 so I could work with real numbers.

Xa and Xb I found to be the same locations as in 1/2 because they are rectangles.

The centroid of a triangle is 1/3L from its peak, so Xc I said it was 1/3.

Xd = 2/3 since the peak is on the right hand side this time.

I don't know how to find the centroid of the last trapezoids. I just know that Xf > Xe and that they are somewhere in between L/3 and L/2 from a hint in my HW.

The current ranking I have from SMALLEST to LARGEST is

Xc, Xe, Xf, Xa, Xb (they are equal), and Xd but that is wrong. How do I solve this?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
When the problem statement said rank the locations of the resultant, it appears it did not specify if they should be ranked from smallest to largest or vice versa.
 
Sorry about that

Rank the items from smallest to largest. To rank items as equivalent, overlap them.

I shall also edit my post
 
This probably doesn't help the person who originally answered the question but the answer is Xc, Xe, Xa, Xb (they are equal), Xf, and then Xd.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top