Stationary satellite in high latitude

AI Thread Summary
A stationary satellite cannot be fixed to a location far from the equator due to gravitational constraints, as geostationary satellites must orbit directly above the equator. The only stable points for a satellite in relation to the Earth are the Lagrangian Points L4 and L5 in the Sun-Earth system, but these are not practical for geostationary purposes. Any satellite placed outside of the geostationary orbit would eventually fall back to Earth due to gravitational pull. While minor adjustments can allow for satellites to operate slightly off the equator, significant deviations are not feasible. Therefore, true geostationary positioning is only achievable at the equator.
pixel01
Messages
688
Reaction score
1
Hi all,

Is that possible that a stationary satellite be fixed to a location far from equator?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No ...
 
... stationary with respect to what? If you mean with respect to Earth ... the only option would be one of the Lagrangian Points (L4 or L5) in the Sun-Earth system. There are also L4 and L5 points in the Earth-Moon system but they are not very stable due to gravitational influence of the sun.

... in a theory, considering only Earth and your satellite, you would basically have to place it at a point where the Earth would exert NO gravitational pull (the satellite would have zero potential energy). Since F = G m1m2 / d^2 there is no point (apart from the center of the Earth) where F = 0, hence your satellite would impact the Earth eventually, no matter how far it was originally placed.
 
I think the poster means fixed over a point on Earth - as in geostationary.
This is only possible over the equator

I thought the poster might come back for a fuller explanation than just "no..." !
 
Last edited:
If it is not very far from the equator necessary corrections are so small, that it can be doable. As far as I remember - before the advent of digital communication - additional satelites on almost geostationary orbits were considered a viable solution to the lack of the bandwidth problem. Amount of fuel necessary for constant orbit corrections was small enough that satellite could operate for years.
 
scibuff said:
... stationary with respect to what? If you mean with respect to Earth ... the only option would be one of the Lagrangian Points (L4 or L5) in the Sun-Earth system. There are also L4 and L5 points in the Earth-Moon system but they are not very stable due to gravitational influence of the sun.

... in a theory, considering only Earth and your satellite, you would basically have to place it at a point where the Earth would exert NO gravitational pull (the satellite would have zero potential energy). Since F = G m1m2 / d^2 there is no point (apart from the center of the Earth) where F = 0, hence your satellite would impact the Earth eventually, no matter how far it was originally placed.

Sorry for the misunderstanding. I just meant geostationary satellites, not something orbiting the sun.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top