Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics

vladittude0583
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a particle confined within a box in the shape of a cube of edges Lx=Ly=Lz.

(a) Suppose that the partice is in a given state specified by particular values of the principal quantum numbers nx, ny, nz. By considering how the energy of this state must change when the length Lx of the box is changed quasistatically by a small amount dLx, show that the force exerted by the particle in this state on a wall perpendicular to the x-axis is given by Fx=-partial derivative of E with respect to partial derivative of Lx

Homework Equations



Xa,r=-partial derivative of Er wit respect to partial derivative of xa

where Xa,r is the generalized force (conjugate to the external parameter xa) in the state r

The Attempt at a Solution



I derived an expression for the quantized energy which is (h2(nx2+ny2+nz2)/(8mLx2)

Do I have to use pressure to some extent? Any advice would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The absolute value of the energy shift which takes place when the length of the box changes is equal to the absolute value of the work done by the system. This work is

<br /> dA = F_x dL_x<br />

vladittude0583 said:
Fx=-partial derivative of E with respect to partial derivative of Lx

It's easier to read the following:

<br /> F_x = - \frac{\partial E}{\partial L_x}.<br />

See
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997&highlight=LaTeX+TeX"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top