Statistical mechanics: multiplicity

SoggyBottoms
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have a surface that can adsorb identical atoms. There are N possible adsorption positions on this surface and only 1 atom can adsorb on each of those. An adsorbed atom is bound to the surface with negative energy -\epsilon (so \epsilon > 0). The adsorption positions are far enough away to not influence each other.

a) Give the multiplicity of this system for n adsorbed atoms, with 0 \leq n \leq N.

b) Calculate the entropy of the macrostate of n adsorbed atoms. Simplify this expression by assuming N >> 1 and n >> 1.

c) If the temperature of the system is T, calculate the average number of adsorbed atoms.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) \Omega(n) = \frac{N!}{n! (N - n)!}

b) S = k_b \ln \Omega(n) = k_b \ln \left(\frac{N!}{n! (N - n)!}\right)

Using Stirling's approximation: S \approx k_B ( N \ln N - N - n \ln n - n - (N - n) \ln (N - n) - (N - n) = k_B ( N \ln N - n \ln n - (N - n) \ln (N - n)

A Taylor expansion around n = 0 then gives: S \approx k_B (- \frac{n^2}{2N} + ...)\approx -\frac{k_b n^2}{2N}

c) I'm not even sure if the previous stuff is correct, but I have no idea how to do this one. Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SoggyBottoms said:

Homework Statement


We have a surface that can adsorb identical atoms. There are N possible adsorption positions on this surface and only 1 atom can adsorb on each of those. An adsorbed atom is bound to the surface with negative energy -\epsilon (so \epsilon > 0). The adsorption positions are far enough away to not influence each other.

a) Give the multiplicity of this system for n adsorbed atoms, with 0 \leq n \leq N.

b) Calculate the entropy of the macrostate of n adsorbed atoms. Simplify this expression by assuming N >> 1 and n >> 1.

c) If the temperature of the system is T, calculate the average number of adsorbed atoms.

The Attempt at a Solution



a) \Omega(n) = \frac{N!}{n! (N - n)!}

b) S = k_b \ln \Omega(n) = k_b \ln \left(\frac{N!}{n! (N - n)!}\right)

Using Stirling's approximation: S \approx k_B ( N \ln N - N - n \ln n - n - (N - n) \ln (N - n) - (N - n) = k_B ( N \ln N - n \ln n - (N - n) \ln (N - n)

A Taylor expansion around n = 0 then gives: S \approx k_B (- \frac{n^2}{2N} + ...)\approx -\frac{k_b n^2}{2N}

c) I'm not even sure if the previous stuff is correct, but I have no idea how to do this one. Any hints?

Part (a) looks good, but you made a couple of sign mistakes in part (b). In the terms in the denominator you forgot to distribute the negative sign to the second term in n ln n - n and (N-n) ln(N-n). I've corrected the signs here:

S \approx k_B ( N \ln N - N - n \ln n + n - (N - n) \ln (N - n) + (N - n) = k_B ( N \ln N - n \ln n - (N - n) \ln (N - n)

This change will result in some cancellations that help simplify your expression. Rewriting

(N-n)\ln(N-n) = \left(1-\frac{n}{N}\right)N\ln N + (N-n)\ln\left(1-\frac{n}{N}\right)

will help you make some more cancellations.

Another mistake you made in your original attempt was that you expanded around n = 0, but you are told n is much greater than 1, so you can't do that expansion. What you can do, however, is assume that while n is much greater than 1, it is still much less that N, such that n/N is small, and you can expand the above logarithms in n/N.

This will give you a simple expression for the entropy. To get the temperature, you need to write the entropy as a function of the total energy. Right now your entropy is a function of number. However, you are told how much energy there is per site, so you can figure out what the total energy is for n adsorbed atoms. Use this to rewrite the entropy in terms of the total energy.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top