Statistical methods recommendation?

Iforgot
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Heya Everybody,

I've gots me sum boat loads of noisy spectroscopic data dat I've gots to sort thru. It's been a while since I've had to jackknife, bootstrap, or weiner filter anything. Can anyone recommend a book for refreshering me memory on these subjects? And any other techniques for analyzing loads of data.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Iforgot. Please use standard English here; textspeak and slang run afoul of the Forum rules. The best book(s) for you depend on the type of analysis you need to do.

For spectral analysis, take a look at texts by Kay or Marple. They have something like spectral analysis or estimation in their titles, and both are good.

Manolakis has a book called something like Statistical Signal Processing that is comprehensive. It covers Wiener filtering, MA, AR and ARMA models, linear and nonlinear spectral analysis, Kalman filtering, adaptive systems, etc. in a single volume.

For detection and estimation, the books by van Trees are excellent. Kay has two highly respected volumes (one on detection, the other estimation) that are sophisticated and rigorous.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top