Statistical models and likelihood functions

Cinitiator
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a couple of notation interpretation questions:
1) What does f_X(x|θ) represent in this case? The realization function of of our random vector X for some value x and a parameter θ (so that if our random vector has n random variables, its realization vector will be a subset of R^n)? Or is something else represented here?

2) If our (non-parametrized) statistical model is based on some random vector X with n random variables, will it contain realization functions of the random vector, or rather the random variable functions which the said vector contains?

3) In case of parametrized models: Is the statistical model set (let's name it P) a set of functions under every parameter space possible? And what do these functions represent? Are they assumed to have a fixed input? Are they realizations of a random vector under every single parameter in the parameter space? Or are they random variable functions which belong to our random vector?

Homework Equations


gdmgb.png



The Attempt at a Solution


Trying to interpret it in different ways, but not knowing which interpretation is the correct one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cinitiator said:
1) What does f_X(x|θ) represent in this case?
It is the probability (density?) function for the r.v. X given the observations θ.
I don't know what you mean by a realization function.
 
haruspex said:
It is the probability (density?) function for the r.v. X given the observations θ.
I don't know what you mean by a realization function.

I know that. I don't know in what precise way this function is 'generated'. That is - do we take an entire random vector (say, an R^n vector with random variables) and input it, and then output a R^n vector in the measure space (probabilities for each R^...)? That's what I call a realization function, since it outputs the realization of this random vector.

Or is the said function generated in an entirely different way given our random variable?
 
Cinitiator said:
do we take an entire random vector (say, an R^n vector with random variables) and input it, and then output a R^n vector in the measure space (probabilities for each R^...)?
No, it can't be that. If you look at the definition of the likelihood function you can deduce that the range of f is ℝ, not ℝn. So I would say it's just a joint distribution.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top