Statistics with confidence intervals

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the necessary sample size to estimate the true mean porosity with a specified margin of error and confidence level. The margin of error is clarified as 0.25, which corresponds to an interval width of ±0.125. Participants debate the interpretation of "to within 0.25," emphasizing that it refers to the desired margin of error rather than the total length of the confidence interval. The correct z-value for a 99% confidence interval is confirmed to be 2.575, aligning with the specified probability. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of accurately defining terms related to confidence intervals and sample size calculations.
war485
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose the porosity (in %) of samples taken from the ground found to be normally distributed with σ = 0.85 %

What sample size is necessary to estimate the true mean porosity to within 0.25
with 99% confidence?

Homework Equations



C.I. = confidence interval = mean +- z*σ*n^(-0.5)
n = (2*z*σ/w)^2
interval width = w
z = 2.575

The Attempt at a Solution



Not really sure what is meant by "... to within 0.25" maybe someone can help clarify this? Is it referring to the confidence interval width? Also, I thought that the confidence intervals do not estimate the true mean. I thought C.I. only estimates whether or not the other samples will have the same mean within the C.I. range.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually "to within xxx" refers to the desired margin of error - this would not be the length of the confidence interval, but half the length.

A confidence interval provides a range of values which can be considered "reasonable values" for the true mean (that is highly non-mathematical language, but I think it gets the point across)
 
thanks for clarifying the problem statdad.
 
0.25 is the interval width ("w"), which is the same as error margin. This can be interpreted as ±0.25. Since it was not stated as ±0.25 but as 0.25, they probably meant ±0.125.

The 99% C.I. implies a 0.5% probability under either tail, as statdad suggested. You should verify that your z value is consistent with that probability.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top