Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Status of Adami's solution to Firewall paradox?

  1. Apr 3, 2016 #1
    A bit over two years ago, Chris Adami et al. published their solution to the firewall paradox (referred to without source in http://msutoday.msu.edu/news/2014/plugging-the-hole-in-hawkings-black-hole-theory-1/, perhaps referring to http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.7914). But what has happened in the intervening two years? That is, before I take the trouble to try to understand this solution, I would like to know whether these results have been accepted (1) as being mathematically valid, and (2) a satisfactory solution in physics, and (3) a generally accepted solution, and if not, why not.
    (Note: I am not sure whether this belongs in cosmology, in quantum physics, in general relativity, or beyond the standard model. I am opting for cosmology, but am open to moving the post.)
    Thanks.

    [Moderator's note: moved to Quantum Physics.]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 3, 2016
  2. jcsd
  3. Apr 3, 2016 #2

    atyy

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    I think this could be in BTSM.

    As far as I know, the firewall paradox is unresolved.
     
  4. Apr 3, 2016 #3
    Hi atyy:

    Would you please be more specific about what "BTSM" is. I tried to search for it but had no luck.

    Regards,
    Buzz
     
  5. Apr 3, 2016 #4
  6. Apr 4, 2016 #5

    Demystifier

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The firewall is not a paradox. It is a proposed solution of the black-hole information paradox. Of course, there are also many other proposals, each with its own problems:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole_information_paradox
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Status of Adami's solution to Firewall paradox?
  1. A Paradox? (Replies: 1)

  2. Paradox or not ? (Replies: 24)

Loading...