Steady State Approximation and Reaction Mechanisms

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the steady state approximation in reaction mechanisms, specifically addressing challenges in eliminating intermediates from equations. A participant seeks assistance in determining the truth of certain statements related to this topic. The advice provided emphasizes writing equations for the time derivatives of chemical species concentrations and setting the derivatives of fast reactions to zero to derive algebraic expressions. This approach helps in solving for the concentrations of short-lived species in terms of long-lived ones, ultimately aiding in simplifying the reaction mechanism. The guidance aims to clarify the application of the steady state approximation effectively.
Gorby
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I need help determining which of the statements are true and false.

http://imgur.com/9BC1Wqf

I know this involves steady state approximation, but I find that when I try it I am never able to rid of all the intermediates.

Please help

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited:
The way I start any problem like this is two write an equation for the time derivative d/dt of the concentration of each chemical species involved in terms of the concentrations of the various species and the reaction rate constants. Then, I set the time derivatives of the fast reactions equal to zero. This leads to algebraic expressions for the fast reactions. I then solve the algebraic equations for the concentrations of the short lived species (in this case free radicals) in terms of the long lived species concentrations. I then substitute the concentrations for the short lived species into the slow reaction time derivatives. This will always get you to where you want to be.

Chet
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top