Steel floating in mercury problem

AI Thread Summary
A steel cylinder with a diameter of 17.85 cm and a height of 32.4 cm is floating in mercury, prompting a calculation of the length above the surface. The relevant formula involves the ratio of densities between the object and the liquid, which was initially misunderstood. The user initially calculated a submerged length but confused it with the total height, leading to incorrect answers. After clarification, it was noted that the length above the surface is found by subtracting the submerged length from the total height. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the problem's requirements and correctly applying the formula.
Liketothink
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 17.85 cm diameter, 32.4 cm tall steel cylinder (ρsteel=7900 kg/m3) floats in mercury. The axis of the cylinder is perpendicular to the surface. What length of steel is above the surface?


Homework Equations


vsub/vobj=(ro)obj/(ro)liquid


The Attempt at a Solution

A
I canceled the two areas so the equation is d/h=(ro)obj/(ro)liquid and then I solved for d. H equals to 32.4 cm I think. I don't know what I'm doing wrong. Please help. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What makes you think you're doing anything wrong? What was your answer? Do you know what the answer is supposed to be?
 
I'm using Loncapa for my class. I received .192 m for an answer an it says I'm wrong.
 
I get a different answer. It's close, but you may have a rounding error. Check your math! Edit, also, what value did you use for the density of mercury?
 
13534 kg/m^3
 
I also tried .189 m but that was wrong as well.
 
Pay close attention to what question you're being asked. You are being asked what length of steel is ABOVE the surface. The calculation I posted is NOT for the portion that is above the surface. If you don't know what I mean, then here's a huge hint: what do you think the sub stands for in the formula you posted, vsub/vobj?
 
I tried that as well. The .189 m ,. But that didn't work. It's ok though thank you for your help still. The teacher must have done an error in the homework problem as he frequently does.
 
  • #10
NO! Read my latest post! You have made a conceptual mistake. But what you have to do to get from 0.189 m to the right answer is very easy. ;)
 
  • #11
Oh! Yeah that's right! It's the length submerged so I have to subtract it from the original length. Thank you so much, I appreciate it.
 
  • #12
No problem! I'm glad you got it!
 
Back
Top