Why are some molecules chiral and others achiral?

AI Thread Summary
Chirality in molecules is determined by the presence of stereocenters, which are carbon atoms bonded to four different groups, making them non-superimposable on their mirror images. Understanding the concept of meso compounds, which have multiple stereocenters but are achiral due to an internal plane of symmetry, is crucial. Building physical models can aid in visualizing chirality and superimposability, enhancing comprehension for tests. Familiarity with mirror planes and inversion centers is also important for identifying chirality. Mastery of these concepts is essential in organic chemistry studies.
Gannon
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
I really don't understand any of this. I already know the answers to these, but I don't know why they are chiral or achiral. Any help is appreciated.

http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g231/Paylardo/Chriality.jpg

The "HO" on the far left was cut off. It is just another hydroxyl group.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
do you understand the term 'meso'? Sometimes it helps to build models of the structures and their mirror image to see if they are superimposable.
 
I've built models, but when it comes to a test I'll need to be able to see that they can superimpose in more ways than one... I've seen meso further in the book where I'm studying, but other than that I know nothing about it. There is something about mirror planes and inversion centers that I understand a little bit, but I can't apply them to these.
 
Derivation on angular acceleration
 
I know how to find stereocenters; would that help me?
 
That is where you start. Familiarity with models will help you visualize the structures (without models) during your test. This is common practice in undergrad organic chem.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top