Stern-Gerlach experiment with orthogonal spin detector

msumm21
Messages
247
Reaction score
28
Suppose we have a Stern-Gerlach apparatus through which we send spin-1/2 particles and subsequently measure their position. If a passing particle "collapses" to the spin up state about X, it moves "up" and is registered by detector U, otherwise it "collapses" to the spin down state about X and moves "down" and is found by detector D. Now I'm wondering if it's possible to embed the passing particles within another detector S which measures the spin about Y (orthogonal to X) without affecting the net EM field from the Stern-Gerlach magnets around the particle? So a particle along with an "attached" detector S would move through the Stern-Gerlach together. I also want to assume (1) the detector S itself has no magnetic moment (if that's possible) and (2) the detector S can be programmed to measure the spin about Y at a fixed frequency F.

If this setup is somehow feasible, I wonder what would happen when F is large? If we repeatedly measure the spin about Y I assume we must get an answer "up" or "down," but in that case it seems the spin cannot spend time in the states with spin up or down about X and hence it would go straight through the Stern-Gerlach, right? But is it possible for such a particle to go through a Stern-Gerlach detector and not "collapse" to the spin up or spin down state about X?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as quantum mechanics is concerned, the interaction that leads to a collapse must be considered instantaneous - there is no "in process" state. This is enforced by the way the mathematical formalism works: there's a "before" state, a bunch of possible "after" states, a rule (the Born rule) for calculating the probability of collapsing into one of the "after" states, but nothing about what happens in between.

Thus, your hypothetical is equivalent to performing spin measurements along different axes in rapid succession. The momentum transfer and hence the particle deflection also happens instantaneously. You could reasonably imagine that the particle is given a kick at the moment of collapse; inertia and the kicks from subsequent measurements will determine the trajectory from there.

In practice such an experiment is completely impractical because the magnetic fields from the two detectors will combine in a way that does something completely different from what you want. A more achievable thought experiment that comes to the same conclusion would use polarized photons passed through a succession of polarizing filters at different angles.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes msumm21 and dlgoff
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top