Still possible to do engineering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kr73114
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering
AI Thread Summary
Selecting subjects in year 10 can impact future academic paths, as seen in discussions about pursuing engineering without prior physics knowledge. Many universities in Australia offer bridging courses to help students catch up on essential subjects, including physics, which is often taught from the ground up in first-year courses. Students without a physics background can still succeed in engineering programs, as foundational courses are designed to accommodate all levels of prior knowledge. Personal experiences highlight that while initial challenges may arise, with determination and support, students can improve significantly and achieve solid grades. Resources like MIT's open courseware are recommended for additional preparation, particularly in calculus, to better understand physics concepts.
kr73114
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
When I was selecting subjects in year 10 I didn't know what to do and didn't pick physics. But now I want to do engineering but I don't have much physics knowledge. I'm confident I can do well in maths and I'm pretty sure I can get into engineering, but I'm not sure about whether I can handle the physics. Btw, I wanted to do chemical engineering. Also, unis in Australia have bridging courses where you can catch up if you havn't done a particuar subject that you need in uni, but this is very brief and covers just the basics. Without much high school physics, can I still do chemical engineering.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I sure hope so. I didn't take high school physics, and I'm in aerospace engineering.
 
Generally, all first year students get put into the same year-long calculus-based physics course, whether or not they have done physics before. There are no prerequisite in terms of physics for that course; it is meant to start from the very beginning and cover the fundamentals. So I don't think there is a problem if you haven't done physics before.
 
Your question has already been answered well, but as a side note, if you want to prepare extra, I'd recommend watching Walter Lewis on MIT open courseware during your summer. Though, you may need to self-study calculus to understand some of the material.
 
Angry Citizen said:
I sure hope so. I didn't take high school physics, and I'm in aerospace engineering.

how you finding that?
 
Not bad. It was rough at first, since I started physics with calc-based physics. I ranked consistently average for most of the two semesters. Then my instructor and I sat down and talked out why I wasn't doing as well as I'd liked, and I ended up kicking major *** on the second semester's final. I could've done much better than I did, and I wound up with solid B's in both courses.

Time will tell if this was pure dumb luck though.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top