Still trouble with time dilation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the time difference due to time dilation experienced by Apollo astronauts returning from the moon at a speed of 25,000 mi/h. The initial calculations for time in Earth's frame yielded approximately 9.55 hours, but confusion arose when attempting to calculate time in the Apollo frame using the time dilation factor. Participants noted that the velocity of the spacecraft is significantly smaller than the speed of light, leading to a very small time dilation effect. The conversation highlighted the need for precise calculations and the importance of considering gravitational effects, suggesting that the problem may not be fully addressed by special relativity alone. Ultimately, the correct approach involves using the gamma factor derived from the velocity-to-light ratio to determine the time difference accurately.
kait
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The Apollo astronauts returned from the moon under the Earth's gravitational force and reached speeds almost 25,000 mi/h WRT Earth. Assuming (incorrectly) they had this speed for the entire trip from the moon to Earth, what was the time difference for the trip between their clocks and clocks on Earth?

Given:
Velocity of Apollow WRT Earth: 25,000 mi/h

Assumed (I'm not sure if I'm actually supposed to use or assume this):
Distance from Earth to the moon: 238, 857 mi

Homework Equations



I believe I have solved for t (Earth's frame), but I'm having a problem solving for t' (Apollo's frame). If I'm doing the time dilation factor right, it would be either 1 or the square root of a negative number, so I'm not sure what to do with that.

The Attempt at a Solution



Earth's Frame:

t=L/v=238,857 mi/ 25000 mi/h=9.55428 h

Apollo's Frame:

t'=t/ɣ=9.55428 h*√(1-(25,000/c)²)=this doesn't work
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you use a value for c less than 25,000 miles per hour? Unless you made a mistake in your calculation, that's the only way to get the square root of a negative number.
 
I converted c=3e8 m/s to c=6.711e8 mi/h and when I put that into the equation, I get 1. Because I was getting 1, I looked at the class notes from this morning and saw that the professor omitted c and just used sqrt(1-(v^2)). When I do that, I get the negative obviously because v^2 is greater than 1.
 
kait said:
I converted c=3e8 m/s to c=6.711e8 mi/h and when I put that into the equation, I get 1. Because I was getting 1, I looked at the class notes from this morning and saw that the professor omitted c and just used sqrt(1-(v^2)). When I do that, I get the negative obviously because v^2 is greater than 1.

You get 1 because the dilation factor is so tiny. You need at least 11 significant figures to see the difference.

The professor uses sqrt(1-(v^2)) because he is using units in which c is equal to 1. In these units, the velocity of the spacecraft is about 3.7*10-5.

For small values of v, you can use
\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-v^2}} \approx 1 + v^2/2 \approx 1 + 6.86*10^{-10}​

Cheers -- sylas
 
Where does the 6.86*10^-10 come from? Wouldn't I use 1+(v^2)/2=1+25,000^2/2=3.12*10^8.
 
Someone please help. I've gotten no sleep because of this problem. I just don't see/ understand what to do at this point in the problem.
 
kait said:
Where does the 6.86*10^-10 come from? Wouldn't I use 1+(v^2)/2=1+25,000^2/2=3.12*10^8.
Note that sylas's (and your professor's) v is really v/c. So find 1+(v/c)^2/2
 
When I use v/c, I get 1 because v is so much smaller than c. Is that the answer; the same as Earth's frame?
 
kait said:
When I use v/c, I get 1 because v is so much smaller than c. Is that the answer; the same as Earth's frame?
No. You're asked to find the time difference, which you can find using the formula sylas gave you. (Even though it's small.)

You should have no problem calculating v/c, then (v/c)^2/2.

For example: v = 25000 miles/hour = 11176 m/s = 1.12 x 104 m/s.
c = 3 x 108 m/s, so v/c = what?
 
  • #10
Ok, (v/c)^2/2= 6.96889e-10, so the answer to my problem is 1+6.96889e-10
 
  • #11
kait said:
Ok, (v/c)^2/2= 6.96889e-10, so the answer to my problem is 1+6.96889e-10

It's a start. You've got a gamma factor.

As a matter of general complaint about the question; it appears you are only considering the time difference from velocity; but given that the trip moves in and out of the gravitational fields, and given that most of it is in free fall, the special relativity calculation is really not adequate. But I don't think that is your fault.

I presume the question is intended to let you use a special relativity calculation. If so, you want the gamma factor -- which you have just calculated correctly -- and you have to use that somehow to get a time difference.

What else would you need, along with the time dilation factor, to get the difference in two clocks?

Cheers -- sylas
 
  • #12
I would need the distance from the moon to the Earth which is 3.84*10^8 m and t=L/v=3.84*10^8/1.12*10^4=3.44*10^4 s. Then to find t', I would use t'=t/gamma and subtract t' from t? But then, I still end up with 3.44*10^4 s, which is t.
 
  • #13
kait said:
I would need the distance from the moon to the Earth which is 3.84*10^8 m and t=L/v=3.84*10^8/1.12*10^4=3.44*10^4 s. Then to find t', I would use t'=t/gamma and subtract t' from t? But then, I still end up with 3.44*10^4 s, which is t.

That's a reasonable approach -- if we ignore all the issues with gravity and general relativity.

You are still seeming to do your calculations with a limited precision calculator and getting hung up because the effect is so much smaller than the total elapsed time.

Can you express the problem in algebra first? In this problem, using the approximation for the time dilation factor of 1 + (v/c)2/2 will give you the right answer. You've got the total time for the trip t. What is the value of t' - t, not as a number, but as an expression involving v?

Cheers -- sylas

Postscript. by the way... the approximation I am using can also be rearranged to be:
\sqrt{1-(v/c)^2} \approx 1 - (v/c)^2/2​
which may be more convenient.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top