Stimulated and spotaneous emission

AI Thread Summary
Light emitted during spontaneous emission is polychromatic due to the random phase and direction of emitted photons, as multiple energy levels can be involved. In contrast, stimulated emission typically results in monochromatic light because it involves a specific transition between two energy levels, with controlled parameters that favor a single frequency. While both processes can theoretically produce monochromatic light, stimulated emission is designed to minimize the variety of frequencies by selecting specific energy states. Devices like lasers utilize this principle to achieve coherent light output, reinforcing the desired frequency through feedback mechanisms. Overall, the key difference lies in the control and coherence of the emitted light in stimulated emission compared to the randomness in spontaneous emission.
ajayguhan
Messages
153
Reaction score
1
Why the light emitted in spontaneous emission is poly chromatic whereas the light in stimulated emissions is monochromanti?

If E1 and E2 be two energy level such that E2 >E1, in both emission the energy difference is fixed, so the frequency and so the wavelength thus the light emitted in both case should be monochromatic but why the light emitted in stimulidated emission is alone monochromatic ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not. They may both be polychromatic if you want it to be.

A transition between a particular pair of energy states will always give the same wavelength ... but you don't normally get just one pair of energy states or just one photon.

You get a variety of colors when there are many different pairs of states involved producing lots of photons.

We usually build the devices relying on stimulated emission to be as monochromatic as possible.
With stimulated emission you can select which pair of states to use - the effect is particularly strong when your feed some of the stimulated photons back through the medium - as in a laser.

He-Ne gas (for instance) can be made to lase at a variety of different frequencies and steps have to be taken to suppress lasing at some of them.
 
ajayguhan said:
If E1 and E2 be two energy level such that E2 >E1, in both emission the energy difference is fixed, so the frequency and so the wavelength thus the light emitted in both case should be monochromatic

Yes, that is true. Assuming a jump between two specific energy levels, the frequency of the light be identical in both cases (monochromatic).

In spontanious emission the phase and the direction will be random. In simulated emission they are the same.

Maybe you can get various other frequencies from spontanious emission because other energy levels are involved. This does not happen with stimulated emission because the parameters are set (controlled) for only a single frequency.

[Edit] Didn't see Simon's post when I replied. What he said...
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top