Stoichiometry Help: C_1_2H_2_2O_1_1 + 12O_2 -> 11H_2O + 12CO_2

  • Thread starter Thread starter NekoVictoria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stoichiometry
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the combustion of table sugar, represented by the equation C12H22O11 + 12O2 -> 11H2O + 12CO2. Participants clarify that ΔH, the heat produced, is -5645 kJ/mol, meaning burning 2 moles of sugar yields -11290 kJ. When only 3 moles of O2 are available, the heat produced is reduced to a quarter of the original amount due to limited reactants. The term ΔH, denoting heat change, is explained as always being negative for combustion reactions, which inherently release heat. The equation was corrected from an earlier typo, confirming the combustion process is accurately represented.
NekoVictoria
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
This is what I was given:

Answer all of the questions concerning the combustion of table sugar,
C_1_2H_2_2O_1_1(s) + 12O_2 (g)\rightarrow 11H_2O(g) + 12CO_2(g)

a. If (weird triangle shape thing(what is this thing anyways?))H for this reaction is -5645 kj/mol, how much heat is produced when 2 mol of sugar are burned?

b. How much heat is produced when only 3 mol of O_2 are available

c. Could this combustion reaction ever have a positive (weird triangle shape)H? Explain.

I am completely stuck, I have no idea even where to start on this problem, and its due tomorrow.
A million thanks to anyone who can help me!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(a)
Your reaction is written (although with a mistake) for 1 moles of the sugar compound. Your question is about 2 moles of this compound. The proportion should seem obvious.

(b)
First, balance the reaction correctly. The concept will then be similar to #(a), but this time, you are basing the decision on the oxygen.
 
That is not a mistake, that's exactly how the question is written.
How is it obvious? I don't see it at all... I have never had to do a question like this before now and it makes no sense, I have absolutely no idea how I'm supposed to calculate that...
 
NekoVictoria said:
That is not a mistake, that's exactly how the question is written.

There is an obvious typo in the reaction equation.

How is it obvious? I don't see it at all... I have never had to do a question like this before now and it makes no sense, I have absolutely no idea how I'm supposed to calculate that...

So you are in one of those schools where they want you to do questions not telling first what they are about... And they don't even ask you check your textbook... Sigh.

This strange triangle thing - Δ - is called delta.

ΔH is the amount of heat produced per mole of the reacting substance.
 
I know this is probably useless but, I thought I would give it some closure since some replies were filled with snide remarks and little was done to resolve the question at hand.

First, I see nothing wrong with the equation, as far as I know, that's the combustion of sucrose and it's balanced correctly.

Either way, ΔH is directly proportional to the moles of, in this case, reactant(s). The concept will still apply if you're manipulating the moles of products. For your given ΔH, it only applies the combustion of sucrose in those specific quantities. Again, if its proportional to the moles:

A) You have twice as much sucrose now - so the combustion will produce twice as much heat: ΔH= 2(-5645 kj/mol)

B) You now have 1/4 of the oxygen you had originally - so combustion will produce only 1/4 of the heat: ΔH= (-5645 kj/mol) / 4

C) Combustion will NEVER be a positive ΔH. It's combustion, combustion always releases heat so ΔH will always be negative. Think about it; when was the last time a fire (essentially combustion) made the surroundings cold?
 
rowkem said:
First, I see nothing wrong with the equation, as far as I know, that's the combustion of sucrose and it's balanced correctly.

Equation was edited, originally it contained 12O instead of 12O2.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top