Stokes' theorem over a tetrahedron

AI Thread Summary
Stokes' theorem is verified for the vector function \(\vec v = y\hat z\) over a tetrahedron, demonstrating that the surface integral of the curl equals the line integral around the boundary. The line integral was computed along a specific path, yielding a result of \(a^2\). The surface integral was simplified by choosing a surface that aligns with the direction of the curl, leading to the area element \(d\vec a = dydz\hat x\). The integration over the defined limits confirmed that the surface integral also equals \(a^2\), thus validating Stokes' theorem. Utilizing geometric properties can significantly streamline the calculations involved in such integrals.
Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
Check the Stokes' theorem for the function \vec v = y\hat z
Here it is over a tetrahedron.

Stokes' theorem suggests:
\int_s {(\nabla\times \vec v).d\vec a = \oint_p\vec v.d\vec r

For the right hand side I computed the line integral from (a,0,0)--->(0,2a,0)--->(0,0,a)--->(a,0,0);
which comes out to be a^2 (matches with the solution given).

For the surface integral, one needs to obtain the expression for the area elementd\vec a of the plane given by the above points, which is where my problem lies. Can someone help me on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't necessarily need the expression for the area element. Remember that you may choose the surface anyway you like as long as it has the triangle as its boundary.
Since the curl point only in the x-direction, choose your surface such that the integration will become trivial.
 
Thank you so much for pointing it out to me. Here is how I figured it out!

\nabla\times\vec v = \hat x
so,d\vec a = dydz\hat x
Taking x=a, y-->0 to 2a-2z & z-->0 to a
\int(\nabla\times\vec v) .d\vec a = \int_{0}^{a}dz\int_{0}^{2a-2z}dy = a^2
Since intregration over other surfaces are trivial.
Hence verifying Stokes' law.
 
Right. Geometrically, the flux through the parts in the xz-plane and the xy-plane are both zero (curl only points in the x-direction) and the flux through the remaining surface is simple the area of that surface, which is a right triangle with height a and length 2a, thus area a^2.

Always look for ways to exploit geometry, since it will speed up your calculations. Calculating fluxes and line integrals generally involve a lot of work, so every bit helps.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top