Stokes Theorem Problem: Surface Integral on Ellipse with Curl and Normal Vector

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Stokes' Theorem to evaluate a surface integral involving a vector field defined by F = xi + x^3y^2j + zk, with the boundary being a semi-ellipsoid in the plane z = 0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to compute the curl of the vector field and expresses uncertainty about performing the double integral over an elliptical region. Other participants suggest alternative methods, including using line integrals and trigonometric substitutions.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different approaches to the problem, including direct integration and the application of Stokes' Theorem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of trigonometric substitutions and the potential conversion to line integrals, but there is no explicit consensus on the method to be used.

Contextual Notes

The original poster indicates difficulty with the integration process and the specific function they encountered. There is mention of homework constraints and the need to adhere to Stokes' Theorem in the context of the problem.

astonmartin
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


F = xi + x3y2j + zk; C the boundary of the semi-ellispoid z = (4 - 4x2 - y2)1/2 in the plane z = 0

Homework Equations



(don't know how to write integrals on here, sorry)

double integral (curl F) . n ds

The Attempt at a Solution



curl F = 3y2x2k
n = k

curl F . n = 3y2x2

So I have a surface integral, which I think I can change to dA since the differential of the surface area is just 1dA...

Now this is where I'm stuck. How do i do the double integral with an ellipse? I tried it in rectangular coordinates but got some function I don't know how to integrate. Help!:confused:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you do this by integrating F dot dr over the boundary curve instead?

r(theta)=cos(theta) I+2sin(theta) J+0 K
 
What function do you get that you can't integrate? It looks like it's just a trig substitution to me.
 
what you can do is use Stoke's theorem to convert to the line integral of the vector filed and then if you use Green's theorem to convert that to a double integral, use a trig sub and then integrate. (integration takes a little bit of work) I think the answer is pi. Anybody agree?
 
Yes, it's pi. Both ways.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K