Strange critter found in Russia

  • Thread starter Thread starter DaveC426913
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strange
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the identification of a mysterious skull featured in a post on English Russia. Participants speculate on its origins, suggesting it may belong to a marine mammal like a manatee or a beluga whale, while others consider the possibility of it being an alligator or crocodile. Key points include the observation that the teeth do not resemble typical herbivore teeth, as some are pointier and there are missing front teeth. There is skepticism about the authenticity of the skull, with suggestions that it could be a hoax involving mixed animal parts. Comparisons are made to various skulls, including those of belugas and alligators, but consensus remains elusive due to insufficient photographic detail. The discussion highlights the challenges of accurate identification based on limited visual evidence.
DaveC426913
Gold Member
Messages
23,839
Reaction score
7,834
http://www.englishrussia.com/?p=251

Those look like mammalian herbivore chompers.

I'm thinkin' marine mammal. Manatee? Elephant seal?

(Frankly, it looks to me like the Flower-Power singer-chick from the Muppet Show.)
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Wow, it does look like the Muppet character.
 
Why are they ruling out something like an alligator?
http://www.evolutionnyc.com/IBS/SimpleCat/product/ASP/product-id/453809.html
http://www.skullsite.co.uk/Gatorcroc/gatorcroc_ven.htm
http://www.mccullagh.org/image/10d-5/alligator-skeleton-1.html

I can't tell if that's just crud all over it or remnants of fur. But, I don't think those are herbivore teeth. It's misleading because a lot of front teeth are missing, but the sockets are there and some of the teeth present are a bit pointier than herbivore teeth. They never show inside the upper jaw to see if there are tooth sockets up on top. There's no gap between incisors and molars like there usually is in herbivores either.

Of course, I wouldn't yet be surprised if it's a complete hoax either with someone assembling different parts of skeletons of different animals and coving it with goopy wet fur to cover the patching.
 
A little bit of research turns up a beluga skull http://www.skullsunlimited.com/graphics/tq-238-lg.jpg , which is an awfully good match, right down to
- the notch in the forward upper jawline,
- the midline ridge,
- the pits in the lower jaw,
- the outward flaring of the rear lower jawbone
all easily visible in http://www.englishrussia.com/images/russian_sakhalin_monster/monster8.jpg"
If it's not a beluga, it's something very similar. (Some are suggesting a beaked whale).
Anyway, not really something exotic after all.

D.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DaveC426913 said:
A little bit of research turns up a beluga skull, which is an awfully good match:
http://www.skullsunlimited.com/graphics/tq-238-lg.jpg
If it's not a beluga, it's something very similar. (Some are suggesting a beaked whale).
Anyway, not really something exotic after all.

D.

I don't think that's that good of a match, but I think comparing that and the alligator skulls shows that, as you said, it's unlikely to be anything exotic. Some sort of aquatic mammal or reptile certainly seems likely.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Moonbear said:
I don't think that's that good of a match, but I think comparing that and the alligator skulls shows that, as you said, it's unlikely to be anything exotic. Some sort of aquatic mammal or reptile certainly seems likely.

Frankly, I think it looks as much like a gator or croc as a telephone does.

Compare some of the details I added in my post above.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Frankly, I think it looks as much like a gator or croc as a telephone does.

Compare some of the details I added in my post above.

I disagree. Those features aren't unique, and the alligator molars look more similar (I put up photos of a bunch of different alligators...there's quite a lot of variety across the species). That midline "ridge" isn't a ridge, it's a bone suture found across a variety of species.

The notch above the tooth is a potentially distinguishing feature, but I couldn't tell if that was a feature of the skull on the unidentified critter or a piece broken off and missing (there's another "notch" more posterior too that also looks like it's a broken piece).

Reality is, there's just not enough shown in the photos to compare with the limited photos found online of skulls. If they had scraped some of the crud back, it might have made it easier.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
10K
2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Back
Top