Strangelets suspended in ambient gas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jerich1000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas
jerich1000
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
I'm aware that searches for strangelets have been going on for many years both on the surface of the Earth, high in Earth's atmosphere, within lunar soil samples, and soon in orbit by satellites put into space.

Aren't theoretical strangelets and strange matter very dense and very heavy? (strange matter density is on the order of 10^17 kg/m^3)

Why would they be found high in the atmosphere? Is it possible for strangelets to be suspended in a gas like regular dust?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The density of a strangelet is the same as the density of a nucleus. Just because nuclei are extremely dense, that doesn't mean that oxygen and nitrogen nuclei can't be found high in the atmosphere. However, I've never heard of searching for strangelets suspended in the Earth's atmosphere. Are you sure you're not misinterpreting what you've read? Please point us to your sources of information.

Here is a paper that may be relevant: http://arxiv.org/abs/nucl-th/0610127
 
Here is a link to a study discussing the possibility of finding strangelets in Earth's atmosphere:

http://iopscience.iop.org/1126-6708/2007/02/077/pdf/jhep022007077.pdf

It appears they're anticipating strangelet equivalents of gases such as nitrogen, argon, etc., rather than larger strangelets of charge analogous to nickel, lead, etc. In other words, smaller strangelets.

Is it possible to suspend larger strangelets in a gas, similar to how dust can be suspended in gas?
 
jerich1000 said:
Is it possible to suspend larger strangelets in a gas, similar to how dust can be suspended in gas?

Reread the message right above yours for the answer.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top