Strategies for kinematics of a four-body decay?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hepth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay Kinematics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on strategies for analyzing the kinematics of four-body decays, particularly in the context of four-lepton final states. Participants highlight the importance of using invariant masses and suggest that while numerical methods are straightforward, analytic solutions may require specific techniques to handle divergences. The preprint referenced provides insights into integrating divergences through coordinate changes, emphasizing the need for tailored approaches based on the decay scenario, such as the presence of resonances and the mass characteristics of the particles involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of four-body decay kinematics
  • Familiarity with invariant mass calculations
  • Knowledge of analytic integration techniques
  • Experience with Feynman parameters and loop integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the PDG's Kinematics guide for decay scenarios
  • Explore techniques for handling infrared and collinear divergences in loop integrals
  • Study the integration methods outlined in the referenced preprint
  • Investigate the impact of resonance presence on decay kinematics
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in theoretical physics, and anyone involved in the analysis of decay processes in high-energy physics will benefit from this discussion.

Hepth
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
457
Reaction score
40
Does anyone have suggestions on the strategies for a four-body decay's kinematics? I'm just wondering what is out there. Last time I had to calculate something I just did it straightforward, but I know there must be other methods. (Like preferring to work in energies over invariants). I usually base it off of

preprint : http://ccdb5fs.kek.jp/cgi-bin/img/allpdf?198311072

But are there new strategies? Say for a four-lepton final state.

Thanks

edit: I should also add, that if you prefer analytic solutions there must be preferred methods. Numerically it probably doesn't matter due to the cuts being easy to implement.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Strategies for what?

Experimentally, I think most analyses look at the invariant masses of 2 or sometimes 3 particles, especially if you expect resonances. There are 5 degrees of freedom in the decay, at least if we can ignore or do not know the initial spin of the decaying particle.
 
So assume a decaying pseudoscalar to 4 leptons (or neutrinos), and you want to calculate the partial width. I have calculated this before, and basically you get integrable divergences when you try to integrate (due to the denominator's energies) that can be removed by changes of coordinates of the invariants. This is seen in the preprint I posted, but the same paper is here if you have access http://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.29.2027

On page 29, the replacements (3.6) are needed to be able to easily do the integral, this is because the denominator is divergent at the integration boundaries.

I guess I'm asking if there are any guides like the PDG's Kinematics, on different situations (2 massive, 2 massless; 4 massive; 4 massless; 2 resonances decaying; 0 resonances) etc. Each case has a scheme of invariants that are beneficial for the analytic integration, and problems that occur, mainly due to the boundaries.

When doing loop integrals there are a lot of guides for controlling your infrared and collinear divergences by looking at the matrices of coefficients of the feynman parameters, and doing certain situations differently. I was looking for something similar for kinematics.

Thank you.
 
No idea about the theoretical side, sorry.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
12K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
917
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K