I Strength of gravity in asymptotic safe gravity

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter kodama
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Strength
kodama
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
144
in classical GR the strength of gravity increase to infinity as mass increases and distance decrease.

in classical GR a black hole consists of an event horizon, and a singularity of infinite density and point-size inside the black hole.

in LQG/LQC strength of gravity eventually becomes repulsive near Planckian densities leading to predictions of a Planck star at the center of a black hole

in string/m theory gravity results in a fuzz ball at Planckian densities

how does strength of gravity in asymptotic safe gravity behave as mass increases and distance decrease?

does it decrease then becomes repulsive at decreasing distance like color force in QCD which is also asymptotic safe ?

how does this affect predictions of black hole singularities ?

i.e if gravity behaves like gravity in asymptotic safe gravity, what is at the center of a black hole?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kodama said:
in classical GR the strength of gravity increase to infinity as mass increases and distance decrease.

in classical GR a black hole consists of an event horizon, and a singularity of infinite density and point-size inside the black hole.

in LQG/LQC strength of gravity eventually becomes repulsive near Planckian densities leading to predictions of a Planck star at the center of a black hole

in string/m theory gravity results in a fuzz ball at Planckian densities

how does strength of gravity in asymptotic safe gravity behave as mass increases and distance decrease?

In general, the term "asymptotic safety" means that interaction strength tends to a finite fixed value as distance goes to 0. Thus, a theory with any such finite value (positive, negative or zero) is asymptotically safe.

However, theories with zero strength are usually called "asymptotically free" (as it is a much nicer property). Normally, "asymptotically safe gravity" theories have a non-zero, usually positive, value.
 
nikkkom said:
In general, the term "asymptotic safety" means that interaction strength tends to a finite fixed value as distance goes to 0. Thus, a theory with any such finite value (positive, negative or zero) is asymptotically safe.

However, theories with zero strength are usually called "asymptotically free" (as it is a much nicer property). Normally, "asymptotically safe gravity" theories have a non-zero, usually positive, value.

in LQC gravity goes to zero then becomes repulsive, is this also "asymptotic safety"

so in"asymptotically safe gravity" theories depending on that non-zero, usually positive, value, it's possible either black holes do not form from stellar collapse, or if they do form, something like a neutron star or quark star or new state of matter is inside the black hole, if gravity doesn't continue to grow stronger and isn't able to overcome pauli exclusion principle among fermions, instead of a singularity in classical GR
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Back
Top