I Study Lagrangian Mechanics: D'Alembert's Principle

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter KT KIM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Virtual
AI Thread Summary
Virtual displacement in Lagrangian mechanics does not include time because it represents an idealized change in a system's configuration that occurs instantaneously, without real movement. This concept is crucial for understanding D'Alembert's principle, which allows for the separation of constraint forces from the equations of motion. By considering virtual displacements, one can derive equations that simplify the analysis of dynamic systems compared to traditional Newtonian mechanics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of grasping these foundational concepts for a deeper understanding of Lagrangian mechanics. Overall, mastering virtual displacement is essential for effectively applying D'Alembert's principle in mechanics.
KT KIM
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Studying Lagrangian mechanics starting from D'Alembert's principle.
I just ran into this.
upload3.png


Why virtual displacement doesn't contain time t for it's coordinates
What does that mean 'take place at a fixed time'?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
KT KIM said:
Why virtual displacement doesn't contain time t for it's coordinates

The simplest answer is that its not 'real' displacement therefore it must not contain change in time - and that's why its called 'virtual'

if a geometrical change in the configuration of the physical system is done consistent with the constraints operating on the system then one can formulate a principle which helps in weaning away the force of constrains from equation of motion. and that has certain advantage over Newtonian description.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Thank you much for fine answer, helped me a lot. Guess need some time to grasp that notion well.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'

I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the 3 body problem unsolvable? And what will happen if someone solves it?'

I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Virtual displacement is not consistent with constraints
Replies
3
Views
2K
Why is Hamilton's Principle assumed to be valid for non-holonomic systems?
Replies
25
Views
3K
A The Lagrange–d'Alembert principle for rigid bodies
Replies
1
Views
1K
A An ab initio Hilbert space formulation of Lagrangian mechanics
Replies
10
Views
2K
Virtual displacement and D'Alembert's principle
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Requirement of Holonomic Constraints for Deriving Lagrange Equations
Replies
1
Views
1K
Why is D'Alembert's Principle stated in terms of virtual displacements?
Replies
4
Views
2K
A Extending Hamilton's principle to systems with constraints
Replies
17
Views
3K
I Mathematical proof for the Lagrangian function
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Lacking intuition with partial derivatives
Replies
18
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top