Studying Relativity: Speed Limit of c in All Inertial Frames?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of the speed of light (c) in the context of special relativity, particularly whether an object traveling at c in one inertial frame must also travel at c in all inertial frames. Participants explore the foundational postulates of relativity and their consequences, examining the relationship between the laws of physics and the behavior of light across different frames of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant postulates that if a particle travels at c in one inertial frame, it should travel at c in all inertial frames, questioning the reasoning behind this assumption.
  • Another participant explains that velocities are not additive in special relativity and introduces the Lorentz Transformation, which ensures that all observers measure the speed of light as c, regardless of their relative motion.
  • A participant expresses a desire to derive the conclusion that an object traveling at c in one reference frame must also travel at c in all reference frames based solely on the postulates that all laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames and that there is a speed limit.
  • Another participant suggests that the two rules mentioned may not be sufficient to define a transformation law and notes that the postulate about light traveling at c in all reference frames is typically considered fundamental to the theory.
  • A participant reiterates the distinction between the postulates and the conclusion regarding the speed limit, emphasizing that the constancy of the speed of light is a postulate rather than a derived conclusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the postulates alone can lead to the conclusion that light travels at c in all inertial frames. There is no consensus on the sufficiency of the stated postulates to derive this conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential limitations in the reasoning surrounding the postulates and their implications, particularly regarding the derivation of transformation laws and the nature of the speed limit.

mmmboh
Messages
401
Reaction score
0
How I studied relativity, we postulated that a particle traveling at c in one inertial frame travels at c in all inertial frame. But now looking through a book, I see that they just postulate that all laws of physics are same in all inertial frames, and that there is a speed limit (c). However then I don't quite get the reasoning on why if an object travels at c in one inertial frame, it follows that it must travel at c in all inertial frames...Is there a contradiction I'm not seeing that if you measure a particle traveling at c, someone moving much faster than you doesn't necessarily have to? This wouldn't change the speed limit in their frame.
(I know this is wrong, I'm just trying to deduce it from how the book did it).
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In special relativity, velocities are not additive. If Observer A sees Observer B moving to the right at .9 c, and Observer B sees Observer C moving to the right at .9c, this does not mean that Observer A sees Observer C moving to the right at 1.8c. Rather, velocity obeys something known as the Lorentz Transformation, which in this case leads Observer A to see Observer C traveling at a mere .994c.

These Lorentz transformation rules guarantee that everyone sees light (or any other energetic massless particle) traveling at exactly c no matter how fast each Observer might be moving with respect to other Observers.
 


I know that, but those laws are derived based on the postulate that an object traveling at c in one reference frame travels at c in all reference frames. I want to know if you can get that based on the postulates:

1. All laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames.
2. There is a speed limit.
 


Someone else is probably better equipped to answer this than I, but from a naive first inspection the two rules you name don't seem sufficient to uniquely define a transformation law.

"Objects observed to be traveling at c in one reference frame will be observed to be traveling at c in all reference frames" is usually taken to be one of the postulates. After all, that was one of the first observations that touched off the whole subject.
 


mmmboh said:
I know that, but those laws are derived based on the postulate that an object traveling at c in one reference frame travels at c in all reference frames. I want to know if you can get that based on the postulates:

1. All laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames.
2. There is a speed limit.

Number 2 is not one of the postulates.

The second postulate is that the speed of light is constant for all inertial frames. The speed limit is a conclusion arrived at from the postulates.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K