Solving the Equation: 8n^2 = 64 n lg(n) with Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niels
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stupid
AI Thread Summary
The equation 8n^2 = 64n lg(n) is identified as a transcendental equation, making it challenging to isolate n algebraically. Graphical methods or numerical approaches, such as trial and error, are suggested for finding solutions, with one known solution around n ~ 6.5. The discussion also raises the question of whether the inequality 8n^2 < 64n lg(n) holds for certain values of n, particularly in the context of algorithm running times. While n is specified as an integer, the interest extends to both real and integer solutions. The need for an analytical approach is emphasized due to exam constraints prohibiting calculator use.
Niels
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How do I solve the following equation?

8n^2 = 64 n lg(n); (0 < n)

n = 8lg(n)
10^n = 10^8 n
...? How do I isolate n?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Niels said:
How do I solve the following equation?
8n^2 = 64 n lg(n); (0 < n)
n = 8lg(n)
10^n = 10^8 n
...? How do I isolate n?

Who says u can?It's typically a transcendental equation.I suggest either graphical method (intersaction of graphs) (done by computer,maybe),or taking a calculator and "solving it through tries".Your equation may have 0,1 or maximum 2 solutions.

Daniel.
 
I already did that with mathematica and got that one solution is x ~ 6.5... I just wanted to know if there was any algebraic solution...

I study running times of some algorithms and got this questions: for that values of n is the following inequality true:
8n^2 < 64 n lg(n)

Is there no analytical approach. This is a potential exam question and were not allowed to use calculators...
 
Is n supposed to be an integer?
 
Yes, n is integer (input size for algorithm) but I'm interested in both cases. (real/integer)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top