Hello everyone,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

When we speak about the SU(2)L group (in electroweak interactions for example), about what group do we talk ? What is the difference with the SU(2) group ? And with the SU(2)R ? Why is the label so important ?

I ask this because I see that a Lagrangien can be invariant under SU(2)L x SU(2)R. I think that means that if we apply any transformation of the SU(2)L and then SU(2)R on the lagrangien, it will give the same lagrangien as before. Is it right ?

Then, when we consider the Higgs mechanism. There is an non zero expectation value, and then via the spontaneous symmetry breaking mechanism, a higgs field appear, etc, and we have another lagrangien. This lagrangien is no longer invariant under SU(2)L x SU(2)R transformations, but well under SU(2)L+R. What does that mean ? What is SU(2)L+R ? How can we know, when we spontaneously break a symmetry, wich symmetries will survive ?

I'm a bit confused with all of that. I hope I'm relatively clear in my message... Please excuse me for my English but I'm non native and I'm still learning this usefull langage. :-)

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# SU(2)L, SU(2)R, other symmetric groups and SSB

Loading...

Similar Threads - symmetric groups | Date |
---|---|

A Did nature or physicists invent the renormalization group? | Mar 7, 2018 |

B Why is state transition probability symmetric? | Mar 31, 2017 |

I Symmetric, antisymmetric or neither | Mar 26, 2017 |

B What’s the difference between TIQM and Time Symmetric QM? (a | Mar 15, 2017 |

I Symmetrized Lagrangian (second quantization) | Feb 15, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**